You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> on 2015/02/15 23:43:21 UTC
[VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
The artifacts can be downloaded here:
http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either
manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to
Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the
VOTE thread for RC2.
I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a
blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the
issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not
inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
Here's my +1:
SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
--
Anshum Gupta
http://about.me/anshumgupta
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [1:07:07.854759]
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>
wrote:
> : The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> :
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> +1 to releasing the following artifacts...
>
> hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987$ cat */*.sha1
> 1840fff82b0e6050cf42042dfe714a5bd9046c89 *lucene-5.0.0-src.tgz
> 20cbd709ad53b526cf2af93487cb8f8b3bbf344e *lucene-5.0.0.tgz
> 2f5440048c0500abb595962e9aca5be0c1476433 *lucene-5.0.0.zip
> b2f71e9bccf0c4546b8f328a92e0dbc9236ab4e4 *solr-5.0.0-src.tgz
> 0c14a5212c4b9d9491881d743390596a19a3e989 *solr-5.0.0.tgz
> 86bd8f086d593308c2c3b85ab8814e1c1f751501 *solr-5.0.0.zip
>
>
> -Hoss
> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>.
: The artifacts can be downloaded here:
: http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
+1 to releasing the following artifacts...
hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987$ cat */*.sha1
1840fff82b0e6050cf42042dfe714a5bd9046c89 *lucene-5.0.0-src.tgz
20cbd709ad53b526cf2af93487cb8f8b3bbf344e *lucene-5.0.0.tgz
2f5440048c0500abb595962e9aca5be0c1476433 *lucene-5.0.0.zip
b2f71e9bccf0c4546b8f328a92e0dbc9236ab4e4 *solr-5.0.0-src.tgz
0c14a5212c4b9d9491881d743390596a19a3e989 *solr-5.0.0.tgz
86bd8f086d593308c2c3b85ab8814e1c1f751501 *solr-5.0.0.zip
-Hoss
http://www.lucidworks.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Thanks everyone for voting. The vote has now passed!
I'll start working on the release later tonight.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:
> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either
> manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to
> Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the
> VOTE thread for RC2.
>
> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a
> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the
> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not
> inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta
>
--
Anshum Gupta
http://about.me/anshumgupta
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [2:09:21.565607]
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Probably not worthy of a respin: I just noticed that Lucene’s CHANGES.txt
> has a section for unreleased 4.10.4.
>
> Steve
>
> > On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
> >
> > Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
> >
> > As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can
> either manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and
> thanks to Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the
> steps in the VOTE thread for RC2.
> >
> > I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a
> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the
> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not
> inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
> >
> > Here's my +1:
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> > http://about.me/anshumgupta
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Well, yes. I think that should be fine.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Probably not worthy of a respin: I just noticed that Lucene’s CHANGES.txt
> has a section for unreleased 4.10.4.
>
> Steve
>
> > On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
> >
> > Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
> >
> > As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can
> either manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and
> thanks to Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the
> steps in the VOTE thread for RC2.
> >
> > I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a
> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the
> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not
> inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
> >
> > Here's my +1:
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> > http://about.me/anshumgupta
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Anshum Gupta
http://about.me/anshumgupta
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Probably not worthy of a respin: I just noticed that Lucene’s CHANGES.txt has a section for unreleased 4.10.4.
Steve
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the VOTE thread for RC2.
>
> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.
+1 ,
my last minute blocker (disable dynamic loading) is tested and works as
expected
Thanks for accommodating that last minute request
--Noble
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:
> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either
> manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to
> Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the
> VOTE thread for RC2.
>
> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a
> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the
> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not
> inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I thought I'd fixed that at enough places, bad that I missed it. Too late
now as 5.0.0 is downloadable from 168/216 Apache Mirrors (77.8%).
I'll fix it anyways though.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think this worth a respin, but I noticed that in the introduction
> of solr/CHANGES.txt it says "...It runs in a Java servlet container such as
> Jetty.", which is not correct since 5.0
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/2015 3:43 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
>> > Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>>
>> The script wouldn't work without Steve's part 3 patch on LUCENE-6231,
>> but I did eventually get there:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [2:38:07.953152]
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
--
Anshum Gupta
http://about.me/anshumgupta
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>.
I don't think this worth a respin, but I noticed that in the introduction
of solr/CHANGES.txt it says "...It runs in a Java servlet container such as
Jetty.", which is not correct since 5.0
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 2/15/2015 3:43 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> > Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>
> The script wouldn't work without Steve's part 3 patch on LUCENE-6231,
> but I did eventually get there:
>
> SUCCESS! [2:38:07.953152]
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>.
On 2/15/2015 3:43 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
The script wouldn't work without Steve's part 3 patch on LUCENE-6231,
but I did eventually get there:
SUCCESS! [2:38:07.953152]
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Shawn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 to release
Java7: SUCCESS! [1:18:30.021508]
Java8: SUCCESS! [2:12:51.645457]
Thanks Steve for the patches on LUCENE-6231. I couldn't get smoke tester to
pass the maven checks without your patch.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:
> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either
> manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to
> Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the
> VOTE thread for RC2.
>
> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a
> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the
> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not
> inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta
>
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:14:31.453723]
I used a new version of my multi-retry smoke tester patch. 11 requests required more than 2 attempts to succeed. 66 requests failed due to timeout. I’ll post a new patch on LUCENE-6231 shortly.
Steve
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Erik Hatcher <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 on RC3. My usual battery of manual tests worked as expected.
>
>
> —
> Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
> http://www.lucidworks.com
>
>
>
>
>> On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>>
>> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>>
>> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the VOTE thread for RC2.
>>
>> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
>>
>> Here's my +1:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>> http://about.me/anshumgupta
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@gmail.com>.
+1 on RC3. My usual battery of manual tests worked as expected.
—
Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 <http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987>
>
> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 <http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987>
>
> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the VOTE thread for RC2.
>
> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not inclined to make those changes to 5.0.
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta <http://about.me/anshumgupta>
Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [2:14:26.111580]
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>
> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either
> manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to
> Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the
> VOTE thread for RC2.
>
> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a
> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the
> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not inclined
> to make those changes to 5.0.
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta
--
Adrien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org