You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> on 2002/04/01 17:07:16 UTC
Project separations and mailing lists
Hi,
I would like to propose some further separation of some of the turbine
code and the creation of two more mailing lists ... all in preparation
for separating a couple pieces of turbine into their own projects.
Right now I think we have two candidates for this process:
Torque
JCS
Torque has its own repository, but I think it would be good have a
separate mailing list to prepare for separation into its own project. I
don't think it's near ready enough to be proposed as a top-level
subproject and I would really like to encourage some cross-pollentation
between Torque and ObjectBridge. I think a separate mailing list would
certainly help facilitate this.
I think JCS is big enough on it's own to be in its own repository with
its own build. John and James are working on it but I think the cruft
needs to be cleaned up and more people need to try it before it can be
proposed as a top-level subproject. But again I think a separate mailing
list would be wise.
Fulcrum probably will go down the same road but I don't think it has the
attention yet.
But I think it would be great to clean Torque and JCS up and get them
out of here so they can be used by a wider audience.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Project separations and mailing lists
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 11:46, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>
> > But I think it would be great to clean Torque and JCS up and get them
> > out of here so they can be used by a wider audience.
>
> Torque should definitely become a top-level project. JCS is great,
> but I'm unsure whether it has the steam to jump to the top-level right
> off the bat.
IMO, neither of Torque nor JCS have what is required to become a
top-level project but a separate mailing list would help us determine
what to do to fix the problems. Then we can either go the commons route
or a separate top-level project.
I just want to separate things.
> Commons might be more appropriate as a first move. JCS
> should go right into the main Commons -- not the Sandbox -- since
> we've already incubated it for Apache in the Stratum repository.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Project separations and mailing lists
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> But I think it would be great to clean Torque and JCS up and get them
> out of here so they can be used by a wider audience.
Torque should definitely become a top-level project. JCS is great,
but I'm unsure whether it has the steam to jump to the top-level right
off the bat. Commons might be more appropriate as a first move. JCS
should go right into the main Commons -- not the Sandbox -- since
we've already incubated it for Apache in the Stratum repository.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Project separations and mailing lists
Posted by Ville Skyttä <vi...@iki.fi>.
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 18:28, James Taylor wrote:
> +1, I think this will be of great benefit to both projects.
+1, me too.
> On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 10:07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose some further separation of some of the turbine
> > code and the creation of two more mailing lists ... all in preparation
> > for separating a couple pieces of turbine into their own projects.
> >
> > Right now I think we have two candidates for this process:
> >
> > Torque
> > JCS
--
Ville Skyttä
ville.skytta@iki.fi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Project separations and mailing lists
Posted by James Taylor <jt...@4lane.com>.
+1, I think this will be of great benefit to both projects.
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 10:07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose some further separation of some of the turbine
> code and the creation of two more mailing lists ... all in preparation
> for separating a couple pieces of turbine into their own projects.
>
> Right now I think we have two candidates for this process:
>
> Torque
> JCS
>
> Torque has its own repository, but I think it would be good have a
> separate mailing list to prepare for separation into its own project. I
> don't think it's near ready enough to be proposed as a top-level
> subproject and I would really like to encourage some cross-pollentation
> between Torque and ObjectBridge. I think a separate mailing list would
> certainly help facilitate this.
>
> I think JCS is big enough on it's own to be in its own repository with
> its own build. John and James are working on it but I think the cruft
> needs to be cleaned up and more people need to try it before it can be
> proposed as a top-level subproject. But again I think a separate mailing
> list would be wise.
>
> Fulcrum probably will go down the same road but I don't think it has the
> attention yet.
>
> But I think it would be great to clean Torque and JCS up and get them
> out of here so they can be used by a wider audience.
>
>
> --
> jvz.
>
> Jason van Zyl
> jvanzyl@apache.org
>
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>