You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Mike Drob (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/18 04:59:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1417) data storage efficiency

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14065945#comment-14065945 ] 

Mike Drob commented on ACCUMULO-1417:
-------------------------------------

[~ecn] - looks like this made it into 1.5.0? Can we close the issue out?

> data storage efficiency
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1417
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1417
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Eric Newton
>
> David Medinets wrote the user's list:
> {quote}
> Are there any published numbers for the amount of disk space used by
> Accumulo versus other products? I'm thinking some dataset like dbpedia
> or something from http://books.google.com/ngrams/datasets. If there is
> not such a comparison, what comparisons would you like to see? What
> about WordNet stored in CSV, MySQL, Cassandra, HBase, and Accumulo?
> WordNet is just a large set of CSV files so it would be a good
> candidate for this concept, I think.
> {quote}
> Good idea.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)