You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by vetrik kumaran murugesan <ve...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/14 23:41:56 UTC
License in Solr
Hi Team,
I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for all
underlying licenses?
example : junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT .
Please let me know if this is the aproriate group who should I send these
questions to..
Regards,
Vetrikkumaran Murugesan
Re: License in Solr
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:41 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>>
>> I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for
>> all underlying licenses?
>>
>> example �: �junit4-ant 2.1.13 has �GPL and MIT .
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let me know if this is the aproriate group who should I send
>> these questions to..
>
> Can you give a specific file in a specific version of Solr? An Apache
> project should not be shipping GPL code. I would be exceptionally
> surprised were this the case. And anyway, the file you refer to is
> Apache Licensed as it comes from the Apache Ant project.
>
> Provide links to the license file you are taking issue with, and
> perhaps we can help you understand it better.
Also, all references I can see to GPL in this directory:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_5x/solr/licenses/
are for dependencies that are dual-licensed. Apache is consuming them on
the basis of the other (non-GPL) license, but reporting both licenses
for the benefit of downstream consumers who may choose to use it on the
basis of the GPL license instead.
Upayavira
Re: License in Solr
Posted by vetrik kumaran murugesan <ve...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Upayavira,
I was using apache solr 5.3.0.
2015-09-14 17:28 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:41 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
> I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for all
> underlying licenses?
>
> example : junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT .
>
>
>
> Please let me know if this is the aproriate group who should I send these
> questions to..
>
>
> Can you give a specific file in a specific version of Solr? An Apache
> project should not be shipping GPL code. I would be exceptionally surprised
> were this the case. And anyway, the file you refer to is Apache Licensed as
> it comes from the Apache Ant project.
>
> Provide links to the license file you are taking issue with, and perhaps
> we can help you understand it better.
>
> Upayavira
>
Re: License in Solr
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:41 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
> I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for
> all underlying licenses?
>
> example �: �junit4-ant 2.1.13 has �GPL and MIT .
>
>
>
> Please let me know if this is the aproriate group who should I send
> these questions to..
Can you give a specific file in a specific version of Solr? An Apache
project should not be shipping GPL code. I would be exceptionally
surprised were this the case. And anyway, the file you refer to is
Apache Licensed as it comes from the Apache Ant project.
Provide links to the license file you are taking issue with, and perhaps
we can help you understand it better.
Upayavira