Re: [SURVEY] Commons-URI or not? - about its needs

[Sung-Gu <je...@apache.org>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Johnson" <er...@tibco.com>

> I too am against a separate URI commons package, at least for the moment.

[snip]

> Anyway, to the extent that a separate URI package would make sense, if
> we had a model such as the above, where most people used the one giant
> JAR instead of the individual ones, the creation of a separate commons
> URI project would be largely one of focus and interest, rather than an
> additional dependency quagmire.

I think so... ;)
Thank you for clearing the current true issue.

Sung-Gu

> -Eric Johnson
>
> Sung-Gu wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I suggest that jakarta-commons provides flexible URI issue
implementations
> >as a package.
> >
> >Various applications using URI concept comes in the internet world.   and
> >they need common mechanisms and algorithms for URI.
> >
> >For example, all internet programs will need fundamental functionalites
of
> >URI like extensible parsing and manipulation container for URL reference,
> >URN and URC,  escape codec mechanism, charset tranformation
functionality,
> >URI transformation from real world identities or URN, or other
> >transformations related to DNS or telephony...   If it would be prepared
> >commonly in Jakarta, we can save development powers.   So I suggest new
> >commons-uri package.
> >
> >FYI, currently the commons-httpclient is using it.
> >
> >Any comments?
> >Or any +1, -1?
> >
> >Sung-Gu
> >
> >P.S.: If the requirement is very weak, I want  to put the new package
into
> >commons-sandbox even for a long while in my opinion...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org