You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Jason Haar <Ja...@trimble.co.nz> on 2008/09/25 04:56:09 UTC
dsbl.org down for good
I just saw this mentioned on the Qmail list, and as I can still see
dsbl.org rules throughout SA, I thought others probably want to know
"DSBL is GONE and highly unlikely to return. Please remove it from your
mail server configuration"
http://www.dsbl.org/
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
Re: dsbl.org down for good
Posted by mouss <mo...@netoyen.net>.
Todd Adamson wrote:
> Would I be correct or incorrect that this will get updated to our rules
> through sa-update. If this does get corrected, what kind of time frame
> are we guessing at? And in the short term, if we zero the score for
> RCVD_IN_DSBL, will that properly disable the test?
>
I have
#disable dsbl.org
score RCVD_IN_DSBL 0
since a long time now.
RE: updates.spamassassin.org 2ndaries not updating (was re dsbl)
Posted by "Randal, Phil" <pr...@herefordshire.gov.uk>.
I've just successfully sa-updated.
Thanks guys.
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-----Original Message-----
From: jm@jmason.org [mailto:jm@jmason.org]
Sent: 26 September 2008 15:05
To: Ned Slider
Cc: kgc@corp.sonic.net; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: updates.spamassassin.org 2ndaries not updating (was re dsbl)
Ned Slider writes:
> Looks like something has gone awry then as I successfully updated this
> morning (to 699147, see below), but as you say it's now reporting
> version 694708:
>
> [4349] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org
> [4349] dbg: channel: update directory
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org
> [4349] dbg: channel: channel cf file
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
> [4349] dbg: channel: channel pre file
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org.pre
> [4349] dbg: channel: metadata version = 699147 [4349] dbg: dns:
> 5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org => 694708, parsed as 694708 [4349] dbg:
> channel: current version is 699147, new version is 694708, skipping
> channel [4349] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
Yes, something's gone awry:
: jm 139...; for h in ns.hyperreal.org. ns1.kluge.net.
a.auth-ns.sonic.net. b.auth-ns.sonic.net. c.auth-ns.sonic.net. ; do dig
5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org txt @$h | grep TXT ; done
;5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. IN TXT
5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 3600 IN TXT "699147"
;5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. IN TXT
5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 3600 IN TXT "694708"
;5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. IN TXT
5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 3600 IN TXT "694708"
;5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. IN TXT
5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 3600 IN TXT "694708"
;5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. IN TXT
5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 3600 IN TXT "694708"
: jm 141...; for h in ns.hyperreal.org. ns1.kluge.net.
a.auth-ns.sonic.net. b.auth-ns.sonic.net. c.auth-ns.sonic.net. ; do dig
updates.spamassassin.org soa @$h | grep SOA ; done
;updates.spamassassin.org. IN SOA
spamassassin.org. 3600 IN SOA ns.hyperreal.org.
pmc.spamassassin.apache.org. 2008092600 86400 3600 2678400 3600
;updates.spamassassin.org. IN SOA
spamassassin.org. 3600 IN SOA ns.hyperreal.org.
pmc.spamassassin.apache.org. 2008092400 86400 3600 2678400 3600
;updates.spamassassin.org. IN SOA
spamassassin.org. 3600 IN SOA ns.hyperreal.org.
pmc.spamassassin.apache.org. 2008092500 86400 3600 2678400 3600
;updates.spamassassin.org. IN SOA
spamassassin.org. 3600 IN SOA ns.hyperreal.org.
pmc.spamassassin.apache.org. 2008092500 86400 3600 2678400 3600
;updates.spamassassin.org. IN SOA
spamassassin.org. 3600 IN SOA ns.hyperreal.org.
pmc.spamassassin.apache.org. 2008092500 86400 3600 2678400 3600
Kelsey, Theo, can you check and see why your secondaries aren't picking
up the zone change on updates.spamassassin.org? cheers,
--j.
Re: updates.spamassassin.org 2ndaries not updating (was re dsbl)
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> Kelsey, Theo, can you check and see why your secondaries aren't picking up
> the zone change on updates.spamassassin.org? cheers,
Grrr. I really need to fix this stupid bind package:
Sep 26 11:31:05 eclectic named[29926]: dumping master file: slave/tmp-8bVUx5lsNT: open: permission denied
it keeps setting the permissions on the directory such that named can't
write to it so updates fail, at least when I upgrade the package as I
did the other day. It's fixed now and I forced a refresh:
Sep 26 11:50:07 eclectic named[29926]: zone spamassassin.org/IN: transferred serial 2008092600
:(
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"Screens are sometimes called displays because they display stuff ... "
- UNIX for Dummies
Re: dsbl.org down for good
Posted by Ned Slider <ne...@unixmail.co.uk>.
Randal, Phil wrote:
> Updates are still at version 694708 for 3.2.5.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
Looks like something has gone awry then as I successfully updated this
morning (to 699147, see below), but as you say it's now reporting
version 694708:
[4349] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org
[4349] dbg: channel: update directory
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org
[4349] dbg: channel: channel cf file
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
[4349] dbg: channel: channel pre file
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org.pre
[4349] dbg: channel: metadata version = 699147
[4349] dbg: dns: 5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org => 694708, parsed as 694708
[4349] dbg: channel: current version is 699147, new version is 694708,
skipping channel
[4349] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
RE: dsbl.org down for good
Posted by "Randal, Phil" <pr...@herefordshire.gov.uk>.
Updates are still at version 694708 for 3.2.5.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-----Original Message-----
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:spamassassin@dostech.ca]
Sent: 26 September 2008 02:25
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: dsbl.org down for good
On 25/09/2008 11:34 AM, Todd Adamson wrote:
> Would I be correct or incorrect that this will get updated to our
> rules through sa-update. If this does get corrected, what kind of
> time frame are we guessing at?
Updates are currently being distributed to the mirrors. DNS will update
in a few minutes.
> And in the short term, if we zero the score for RCVD_IN_DSBL, will
> that properly disable the test?
It will, but it's not really necessary as they're currently serving an
empty zone. People not using sa-update should zero the score for the
rule though.
Daryl
Re: dsbl.org down for good
Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
On 25/09/2008 11:34 AM, Todd Adamson wrote:
> Would I be correct or incorrect that this will get updated to our rules
> through sa-update. If this does get corrected, what kind of time frame
> are we guessing at?
Updates are currently being distributed to the mirrors. DNS will update
in a few minutes.
> And in the short term, if we zero the score for
> RCVD_IN_DSBL, will that properly disable the test?
It will, but it's not really necessary as they're currently serving an
empty zone. People not using sa-update should zero the score for the
rule though.
Daryl
Re: dsbl.org down for good
Posted by Todd Adamson <ta...@routers.com>.
Would I be correct or incorrect that this will get updated
to our rules through sa-update. If this does get corrected,
what kind of time frame are we guessing at? And in the
short term, if we zero the score for RCVD_IN_DSBL, will that
properly disable the test?
Todd
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Thanks Jason! I've opened bug 5988.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daryl
>
Re: dsbl.org down for good
Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
Thanks Jason! I've opened bug 5988.
Regards,
Daryl