You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wink.apache.org by Mike Rheinheimer <ro...@apache.org> on 2010/04/09 16:50:40 UTC
Call for volunteers to run JAX-RS 1.1 TCK
Hi team,
My company will not allow me to sign the NDA to get and execute the
JAX-RS 1.1 TCK. Would anyone be willing to volunteer to run the 1.1
TCK against the latest trunk build in preparation for Wink 1.1
release? I'll take suggestions of whom to ask as well, of course.
Thanks much!
mike
Re: Call for volunteers to run JAX-RS 1.1 TCK
Posted by Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>.
It's ok with me.
I just mentioned it, since Jersey 1.1.* has dependency on Servlet 3, and it
has some impact on TCK 1.1.
However, I'm not sure if it will cause any problems or not.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> Right, servlet 3.0 isn't required.
>
> Section 2.3.2 says that it is "RECOMMENDED that implementations support the
> Servlet 3 framework pluggability". In other words, they would like to see
> that 1.1 runtimes include a ContainerInitializer that the web container can
> then call during startup.
>
> This should be one of the top priorities in the next release and is
> critical to our integration in Geronimo.
>
> -Nick
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Bryant Luk ---04/26/2010 09:36:14
> AM---Thanks Michael.]Bryant Luk ---04/26/2010 09:36:14 AM---Thanks
> Michael.
>
>
> *Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>*
>
> 04/26/2010 09:35 AM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: Call for volunteers to run JAX-RS 1.1 TCK
>
> Thanks Michael.
>
> I don't believe the Servlet 3.0 is required as a third party runtime.
> There are statements that indicate running in a pre-Servlet 3.0
> container. However, I have no idea if the 1.1 TCK has any tests
> specifically for it. I think we can claim that we're aiming for
> JAX-RS 1.1 compliance right now for this release if we can't get a 1.1
> TCK run.
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't volunteer to run 1.1 TCK, since I'm not sure I'll have time to
> > install it.
> > Hopefully I'll have time to run 1.0 TCK.
> >
> > But, I have a question. AFAIK JAX-RS 1.1 requires Servlet 3.0. As I see,
> the
> > dependencies for Wink 1.1 were not changed.
> > So my question is: did anyone try to run Wink 1.1 in Servlet 3.0
> > environment?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <ro...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi team,
> >>
> >> My company will not allow me to sign the NDA to get and execute the
> >> JAX-RS 1.1 TCK. Would anyone be willing to volunteer to run the 1.1
> >> TCK against the latest trunk build in preparation for Wink 1.1
> >> release? I'll take suggestions of whom to ask as well, of course.
> >>
> >> Thanks much!
> >> mike
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: Call for volunteers to run JAX-RS 1.1 TCK
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
Right, servlet 3.0 isn't required.
Section 2.3.2 says that it is "RECOMMENDED that implementations support the
Servlet 3 framework pluggability". In other words, they would like to see
that 1.1 runtimes include a ContainerInitializer that the web container can
then call during startup.
This should be one of the top priorities in the next release and is
critical to our integration in Geronimo.
-Nick
Bryant Luk
<bryant.luk@gmail
.com> To
wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
04/26/2010 09:35 cc
AM
Subject
Re: Call for volunteers to run
Please respond to JAX-RS 1.1 TCK
wink-dev@incubato
r.apache.org
Thanks Michael.
I don't believe the Servlet 3.0 is required as a third party runtime.
There are statements that indicate running in a pre-Servlet 3.0
container. However, I have no idea if the 1.1 TCK has any tests
specifically for it. I think we can claim that we're aiming for
JAX-RS 1.1 compliance right now for this release if we can't get a 1.1
TCK run.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't volunteer to run 1.1 TCK, since I'm not sure I'll have time to
> install it.
> Hopefully I'll have time to run 1.0 TCK.
>
> But, I have a question. AFAIK JAX-RS 1.1 requires Servlet 3.0. As I see,
the
> dependencies for Wink 1.1 were not changed.
> So my question is: did anyone try to run Wink 1.1 in Servlet 3.0
> environment?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi team,
>>
>> My company will not allow me to sign the NDA to get and execute the
>> JAX-RS 1.1 TCK. Would anyone be willing to volunteer to run the 1.1
>> TCK against the latest trunk build in preparation for Wink 1.1
>> release? I'll take suggestions of whom to ask as well, of course.
>>
>> Thanks much!
>> mike
>>
>
Re: Call for volunteers to run JAX-RS 1.1 TCK
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Michael.
I don't believe the Servlet 3.0 is required as a third party runtime.
There are statements that indicate running in a pre-Servlet 3.0
container. However, I have no idea if the 1.1 TCK has any tests
specifically for it. I think we can claim that we're aiming for
JAX-RS 1.1 compliance right now for this release if we can't get a 1.1
TCK run.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't volunteer to run 1.1 TCK, since I'm not sure I'll have time to
> install it.
> Hopefully I'll have time to run 1.0 TCK.
>
> But, I have a question. AFAIK JAX-RS 1.1 requires Servlet 3.0. As I see, the
> dependencies for Wink 1.1 were not changed.
> So my question is: did anyone try to run Wink 1.1 in Servlet 3.0
> environment?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi team,
>>
>> My company will not allow me to sign the NDA to get and execute the
>> JAX-RS 1.1 TCK. Would anyone be willing to volunteer to run the 1.1
>> TCK against the latest trunk build in preparation for Wink 1.1
>> release? I'll take suggestions of whom to ask as well, of course.
>>
>> Thanks much!
>> mike
>>
>
Re: Call for volunteers to run JAX-RS 1.1 TCK
Posted by Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>.
I don't volunteer to run 1.1 TCK, since I'm not sure I'll have time to
install it.
Hopefully I'll have time to run 1.0 TCK.
But, I have a question. AFAIK JAX-RS 1.1 requires Servlet 3.0. As I see, the
dependencies for Wink 1.1 were not changed.
So my question is: did anyone try to run Wink 1.1 in Servlet 3.0
environment?
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> My company will not allow me to sign the NDA to get and execute the
> JAX-RS 1.1 TCK. Would anyone be willing to volunteer to run the 1.1
> TCK against the latest trunk build in preparation for Wink 1.1
> release? I'll take suggestions of whom to ask as well, of course.
>
> Thanks much!
> mike
>