You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Anne Kathrine Petteroe <yo...@gmail.com> on 2009/02/24 10:45:59 UTC
UI branch
Hi,
I am in dire need of a web UI for demo purposes.
I might have found a customer here in Norway for a pilot project, and
I would like to move as fast as possible before they discover other
services like Yammer.
I have therefore decided to create a branch and work with Mrinal on
making the web UI we started on last autumn run with the current
Apache code.
This does not in any way mean that Bill should stop his work, but as I
see it right now it is the fastest way for us to get a UI up and
running.
/Anne
AW: Maven Build is broken
Posted by "Hirsch, Richard" <ri...@siemens.com>.
Thanks all.
Build is working again and I just deployed to Stax - http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net
D.
________________________________
Von: David Pollak [mailto:feeder.of.the.bears@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mi 04.03.2009 19:05
An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Maven Build is broken
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:44 AM, David Pollak
<fe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Folks,
> David Bernard (Lift's Maven guru and the guy who maintains scala-tools.org)
> has some choice things to say about the way the OpenID4Java folks manage
> their pom files. If anyone knows any of the Openid4Java guys, please
> repeatedly whack them over the head with their broken pom.
>
Okay... It's all updated!
>
> David inserted:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>com.ibm.icu</groupId>
> <artifactId>icu4j</artifactId>
> <version>3.4.4</version>
> </dependency>
> </dependencies>
>
> Into the Lift pom and it cleared up the problem.
>
> I'll update ESME to run on Lift 1.0 (yes, it's released) and hopefully it
> will make the OpenID problem go away.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Umm.... I just checked the logs at repo1.maven.org and had Brett check
>> the
>> sync logs to his mirror. There is no indication that 3.4.1 EVER existed
>> at
>> central. The logs indicate 4.0.1 being added, but nothing about 3.4.1.
>>
>> Are you sure you were getting that jar from central and not some other
>> repository defined in a pom someplace? My gut feeling is that you were
>> grabbing it from someplace else and that location is no longer available
>> so
>> it's dropping down to checking central. (remember, central is checked
>> last
>> only if it's not found elsewhere)
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Wed March 4 2009 2:56:26 am Hirsch, Richard wrote:
>> > As Daniel pointed out last night, the maven build is currently broken.
>> >
>> > I have no idea if the problem is scala- or maven-based.
>> >
>> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/ibm/icu/icu4j/3.4.1/icu4j-3.4.1.jarcan
>> > not found, because there has been a version change from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4/
>> >
>> > Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > D.
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net <http://liftweb.net/>
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net <http://liftweb.net/>
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp
Re: Maven Build is broken
Posted by David Pollak <fe...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:44 AM, David Pollak
<fe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Folks,
> David Bernard (Lift's Maven guru and the guy who maintains scala-tools.org)
> has some choice things to say about the way the OpenID4Java folks manage
> their pom files. If anyone knows any of the Openid4Java guys, please
> repeatedly whack them over the head with their broken pom.
>
Okay... It's all updated!
>
> David inserted:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>com.ibm.icu</groupId>
> <artifactId>icu4j</artifactId>
> <version>3.4.4</version>
> </dependency>
> </dependencies>
>
> Into the Lift pom and it cleared up the problem.
>
> I'll update ESME to run on Lift 1.0 (yes, it's released) and hopefully it
> will make the OpenID problem go away.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Umm.... I just checked the logs at repo1.maven.org and had Brett check
>> the
>> sync logs to his mirror. There is no indication that 3.4.1 EVER existed
>> at
>> central. The logs indicate 4.0.1 being added, but nothing about 3.4.1.
>>
>> Are you sure you were getting that jar from central and not some other
>> repository defined in a pom someplace? My gut feeling is that you were
>> grabbing it from someplace else and that location is no longer available
>> so
>> it's dropping down to checking central. (remember, central is checked
>> last
>> only if it's not found elsewhere)
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Wed March 4 2009 2:56:26 am Hirsch, Richard wrote:
>> > As Daniel pointed out last night, the maven build is currently broken.
>> >
>> > I have no idea if the problem is scala- or maven-based.
>> >
>> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/ibm/icu/icu4j/3.4.1/icu4j-3.4.1.jarcan
>> > not found, because there has been a version change from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4/
>> >
>> > Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > D.
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp
Re: Maven Build is broken
Posted by David Pollak <fe...@gmail.com>.
Folks,
David Bernard (Lift's Maven guru and the guy who maintains scala-tools.org)
has some choice things to say about the way the OpenID4Java folks manage
their pom files. If anyone knows any of the Openid4Java guys, please
repeatedly whack them over the head with their broken pom.
David inserted:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.ibm.icu</groupId>
<artifactId>icu4j</artifactId>
<version>3.4.4</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Into the Lift pom and it cleared up the problem.
I'll update ESME to run on Lift 1.0 (yes, it's released) and hopefully it
will make the OpenID problem go away.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Umm.... I just checked the logs at repo1.maven.org and had Brett check
> the
> sync logs to his mirror. There is no indication that 3.4.1 EVER existed
> at
> central. The logs indicate 4.0.1 being added, but nothing about 3.4.1.
>
> Are you sure you were getting that jar from central and not some other
> repository defined in a pom someplace? My gut feeling is that you were
> grabbing it from someplace else and that location is no longer available so
> it's dropping down to checking central. (remember, central is checked last
> only if it's not found elsewhere)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wed March 4 2009 2:56:26 am Hirsch, Richard wrote:
> > As Daniel pointed out last night, the maven build is currently broken.
> >
> > I have no idea if the problem is scala- or maven-based.
> >
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/ibm/icu/icu4j/3.4.1/icu4j-3.4.1.jarcan
> > not found, because there has been a version change from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4/
> >
> > Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
> >
> >
> >
> > D.
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp
Re: Maven Build is broken
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Umm.... I just checked the logs at repo1.maven.org and had Brett check the
sync logs to his mirror. There is no indication that 3.4.1 EVER existed at
central. The logs indicate 4.0.1 being added, but nothing about 3.4.1.
Are you sure you were getting that jar from central and not some other
repository defined in a pom someplace? My gut feeling is that you were
grabbing it from someplace else and that location is no longer available so
it's dropping down to checking central. (remember, central is checked last
only if it's not found elsewhere)
Dan
On Wed March 4 2009 2:56:26 am Hirsch, Richard wrote:
> As Daniel pointed out last night, the maven build is currently broken.
>
> I have no idea if the problem is scala- or maven-based.
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/ibm/icu/icu4j/3.4.1/icu4j-3.4.1.jar can
> not found, because there has been a version change from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4/
>
> Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
>
>
>
> D.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
AW: Maven Build is broken
Posted by "Hirsch, Richard" <ri...@siemens.com>.
I just looked at the modification date for jar in question. It isn't a recent change. So, obviously the change is somewhere else.
D.
________________________________
Von: Hirsch, Richard
Gesendet: Mi 04.03.2009 08:56
An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Maven Build is broken
As Daniel pointed out last night, the maven build is currently broken.
I have no idea if the problem is scala- or maven-based.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/ibm/icu/icu4j/3.4.1/icu4j-3.4.1.jar can not found, because there has been a version change from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4/
Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
D.
Maven Build is broken
Posted by "Hirsch, Richard" <ri...@siemens.com>.
As Daniel pointed out last night, the maven build is currently broken.
I have no idea if the problem is scala- or maven-based.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/ibm/icu/icu4j/3.4.1/icu4j-3.4.1.jar can not found, because there has been a version change from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4/
Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
D.
Re: AW: UI branch
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Anne Kathrine Petteroe
<yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I forgot to mention this in my email.
> We have planned to make a "hybrid" model, taking what we already have and
> combining that with Bill's suggestions.
> It won't make any sense at this point to introduce all of Bill's suggestion
> into the design, because many of the features aren't ready on the
> server-side yet. But what we for instance will do is to make the right
> sidebar.
(just a FWIW)
with subversion, i now often use svn:externals to pull together
codebases where in the past i would have created a branch. this means
that the core code is continuously integrated and mergers are usually
unnecessary.
- robert
Re: AW: UI branch
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petteroe <yo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I forgot to mention this in my email.
We have planned to make a "hybrid" model, taking what we already have
and combining that with Bill's suggestions.
It won't make any sense at this point to introduce all of Bill's
suggestion into the design, because many of the features aren't ready
on the server-side yet. But what we for instance will do is to make
the right sidebar.
/Anne
On 24. feb.. 2009, at 12.52, Hirsch, Richard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to make the suggestion that we use Bill's post ( http://www.mail-archive.com/esme-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00235.html
> ) as a foundation for the new branch. Take the best from Mrinal's
> UI and combine them with Bill's ideas - definitely a winning
> combination. I don't see a conflict between the two but rather view
> them as complementary.
>
> D.
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Anne Kathrine Petteroe [mailto:yojibee@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 10:46
> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: UI branch
>
> Hi,
>
> I am in dire need of a web UI for demo purposes.
> I might have found a customer here in Norway for a pilot project, and
> I would like to move as fast as possible before they discover other
> services like Yammer.
>
> I have therefore decided to create a branch and work with Mrinal on
> making the web UI we started on last autumn run with the current
> Apache code.
> This does not in any way mean that Bill should stop his work, but as I
> see it right now it is the fastest way for us to get a UI up and
> running.
>
> /Anne
AW: UI branch
Posted by "Hirsch, Richard" <ri...@siemens.com>.
Hi,
I would like to make the suggestion that we use Bill's post ( http://www.mail-archive.com/esme-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00235.html ) as a foundation for the new branch. Take the best from Mrinal's UI and combine them with Bill's ideas - definitely a winning combination. I don't see a conflict between the two but rather view them as complementary.
D.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Anne Kathrine Petteroe [mailto:yojibee@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 10:46
An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: UI branch
Hi,
I am in dire need of a web UI for demo purposes.
I might have found a customer here in Norway for a pilot project, and
I would like to move as fast as possible before they discover other
services like Yammer.
I have therefore decided to create a branch and work with Mrinal on
making the web UI we started on last autumn run with the current
Apache code.
This does not in any way mean that Bill should stop his work, but as I
see it right now it is the fastest way for us to get a UI up and
running.
/Anne