You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@flume.apache.org by deng kai <de...@baidu.com> on 2016/08/25 06:45:47 UTC

Re: Review Request 50485: bug fix in Exec source


> On \u4e03\u6708 27, 2016, 6:44 p.m., Mike Percy wrote:
> > Hi Deng Kai, thank you for the patch. Could you please also write a test for this?

No problem, it's my pleasure.


- deng


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50485/#review143776
-----------------------------------------------------------


On \u4e03\u6708 27, 2016, 7:46 a.m., deng kai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50485/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated \u4e03\u6708 27, 2016, 7:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Flume.
> 
> 
> Repository: flume-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The two flush thread may lead channel into wrong status when channel is full?With file channel, it will generate massive small log file and log.meta.tmp if set restart = true.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/source/ExecSource.java 52ea808 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50485/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> deng kai
> 
>