You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@olingo.apache.org by "Nagendra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/02 05:05:18 UTC

[jira] [Created] (OLINGO-895) Support for @VirtualAccess

Nagendra created OLINGO-895:
-------------------------------

             Summary: Support for @VirtualAccess
                 Key: OLINGO-895
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-895
             Project: Olingo
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: odata2-jpa
            Reporter: Nagendra
            Priority: Critical
             Fix For: V2 2.0.7, V2 2.1.0


JPA entities annotated with @VirtualAccess do not have explicit setters/getters for each attributes rather an generic get(propertyName), set(value,propertyName).
This allows for dynamic extensibility at runtime, like dynamic mapping of new columns to existing entities or even dynamic mapping of new tables/views. 

For example:

EclipseLink provides dynamic mapping of a DB table/view as explained in the wiki below
https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Examples/JPA/Dynamic#Dynamic_Configuration_using_API

Design details : http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/Dynamic

In cloud world this provides lot of flexibility as each tenant can have their own extensions of the data model which needs to be exposed via OData APIs and this with this feature one build a generic code which can handle these tenant specific extensions.

But currently Olingo JPA processor expects the JPA Entity POJO to have named setters and getters only. 

This needs to be enhanced to support the generic get(propertyName) and set(propertyName, value) type of POJOs thus enabling the framework consumer to tap into the dynamic JPA extensibility.

A basic support for this would go a long way, as currently without meddling with the JPA processor code it would not be possible to support this feature.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)