Re: [jira] Closed: (CAY-1319) Minimal DI container-based configuration to run Cayenne

[Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>]

The plan is to switch to DI completely and remove o.a.c.conf and  
o.a.c.project packages. This work is being done right now by Olga and  
myself (CAY-1318, CAY-1339, etc.). So there won't be 2 ways to start  
Cayenne, only the DI way, and we'll switch the tests once the rest of  
the cleanup is done, and we are ready to expose DI-based config to the  
end users.

I know this becomes the bottleneck for a number of tasks that could  
benefit from DI (logging formatting, query builders, etc.), so are are  
trying to get it out ASAP.

Andrus


On Jan 10, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> Andrus,
>
> I see configuration *can* be loaded using IoC-module, thus vars with  
> @Inject
> annotations are processed. But seems this is not enabled by default  
> - at
> least in test stack. I mean, when I try to provide @Inject to a  
> variable not
> from o.a.c.configuration package it is not injected. Are there plans  
> to
> completely switch to loading via CayenneServerModule? Should our  
> code always
> support both DI and non-DI loading?
> (i'm asking because using DI can help to get rid of ugly hacks I  
> made in
> CAY-1236)
>
> 2009/12/7 Andrus Adamchik (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>
>>
>>    [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel 
>> ]
>>
>> Andrus Adamchik closed CAY-1319.
>> --------------------------------
>>
>>   Resolution: Fixed
>>
>>> Minimal DI container-based configuration to run Cayenne
>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>                Key: CAY-1319
>>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1319
>>>            Project: Cayenne
>>>         Issue Type: Task
>>>         Components: Cayenne Core Library
>>>   Affects Versions: 3.1M1
>>>           Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
>>>           Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
>>>            Fix For: 3.1M1
>>>
>>>
>>> Need to implement loading of Cayenne runtime configuration via a DI
>> mechanism. This will include moving cayenne-di module from sandbox to
>> Cayenne proper and using it to provide access to DataDomain to the
>> applications.
>>> (this is very closely related to CAY-1318, as per CAY-1318 it is  
>>> likely
>> that in the future Configuration class will be removed from Cayenne  
>> and a
>> replacement needs to be provided)
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Andrey