You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Haohui Mai (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/04 19:24:28 UTC
[jira] [Reopened] (HDFS-8855) Webhdfs client leaks active NameNode
connections
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Haohui Mai reopened HDFS-8855:
------------------------------
This patch breaks Jenkins around 2 weeks. I reverted this patch in trunk and branch-2 for now to keep Jenkins happy.
[~xiaobingo], can you please consolidate the effort of all the follow up jiras and post a new patch? Thanks.
> Webhdfs client leaks active NameNode connections
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-8855
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8855
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: webhdfs
> Reporter: Bob Hansen
> Assignee: Xiaobing Zhou
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-8855.005.patch, HDFS-8855.006.patch, HDFS-8855.007.patch, HDFS-8855.1.patch, HDFS-8855.2.patch, HDFS-8855.3.patch, HDFS-8855.4.patch, HDFS_8855.prototype.patch
>
>
> The attached script simulates a process opening ~50 files via webhdfs and performing random reads. Note that there are at most 50 concurrent reads, and all webhdfs sessions are kept open. Each read is ~64k at a random position.
> The script periodically (once per second) shells into the NameNode and produces a summary of the socket states. For my test cluster with 5 nodes, it took ~30 seconds for the NameNode to have ~25000 active connections and fails.
> It appears that each request to the webhdfs client is opening a new connection to the NameNode and keeping it open after the request is complete. If the process continues to run, eventually (~30-60 seconds), all of the open connections are closed and the NameNode recovers.
> This smells like SoftReference reaping. Are we using SoftReferences in the webhdfs client to cache NameNode connections but never re-using them?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)