You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> on 2025/08/12 10:19:05 UTC

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Hey all,

I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
votes have been received.

Consider this my (binding) +1.

Airflow Providers are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/

*apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
 Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider
distributions.

*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
 Python "wheel" release.

The test procedure for PMC members is described in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members

The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
described in:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors


Public keys are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS

Please vote accordingly:

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".

Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
the artifact checksums when we actually release it.

The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398

The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
candidates.
Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
after the
RC candidates are released.

You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:

https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/

Cheers,
Elad Kalif

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Posted by Vishnu Chilukoori <vi...@gmail.com>.
1 non-binding


--
Regards,
Vishnu Chilukoori

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 8:12 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 non-binding
>
> Verified changes and triggered some examples all looks good.
>
> Pavan
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 12:12 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding):
> > * checked reproducibility
> > * checked file list
> > * checked installing in docker
> > * checked signatures, licences, checksums
> >
> > All good!
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:08 PM Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding. I installed it using Breeze and tested my set of sample
> > > example DAGs for standard and fab providers.
> > >
> > > *Ankit*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 2:17 PM Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding
> > > >
> > > > Bugra Ozturk
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, 07:29 Amogh Desai, <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding.
> > > > >
> > > > > Performed the following checks:
> > > > >
> > > > > * Checked SVN
> > > > > * Checked in Docker
> > > > > * Checked reproducible package builds
> > > > > * Checked licenses
> > > > > * Checked signatures
> > > > >
> > > > > I installed the bits with breeze and tested my set of simple
> example
> > > > dags,
> > > > > mainly around the
> > > > > standard provider.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > Amogh Desai
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM Jens Scheffler
> > > > <j_scheffler@gmx.de.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package
> > > > build,
> > > > > > Licenses, Signatures
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration
> > test
> > > > > > Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very
> simplistic
> > > > test.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote:
> > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> > email
> > > > is
> > > > > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours -
> > which
> > > > > means
> > > > > > > that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3
> > > binding
> > > > +1
> > > > > > > votes have been received.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > > > >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for
> > the
> > > > > > Provider
> > > > > > > distributions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > > > >   Python "wheel" release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test
> > this
> > > > RC
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > described in:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> > > community
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept
> > here:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > RC
> > > > > > > candidates.
> > > > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > > > > documentation
> > > > > > > after the
> > > > > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Posted by Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding

Verified changes and triggered some examples all looks good.

Pavan

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 12:12 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding):
> * checked reproducibility
> * checked file list
> * checked installing in docker
> * checked signatures, licences, checksums
>
> All good!
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:08 PM Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding. I installed it using Breeze and tested my set of sample
> > example DAGs for standard and fab providers.
> >
> > *Ankit*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 2:17 PM Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding
> > >
> > > Bugra Ozturk
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, 07:29 Amogh Desai, <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding.
> > > >
> > > > Performed the following checks:
> > > >
> > > > * Checked SVN
> > > > * Checked in Docker
> > > > * Checked reproducible package builds
> > > > * Checked licenses
> > > > * Checked signatures
> > > >
> > > > I installed the bits with breeze and tested my set of simple example
> > > dags,
> > > > mainly around the
> > > > standard provider.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > Amogh Desai
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM Jens Scheffler
> > > <j_scheffler@gmx.de.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package
> > > build,
> > > > > Licenses, Signatures
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration
> test
> > > > > Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very simplistic
> > > test.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote:
> > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> email
> > > is
> > > > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours -
> which
> > > > means
> > > > > > that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3
> > binding
> > > +1
> > > > > > votes have been received.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > > >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for
> the
> > > > > Provider
> > > > > > distributions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > > >   Python "wheel" release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test
> this
> > > RC
> > > > is
> > > > > > described in:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> > community
> > > > are
> > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept
> here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included
> in
> > > the
> > > > RC
> > > > > > candidates.
> > > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > > > documentation
> > > > > > after the
> > > > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
> > > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
> > > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1 (binding):
* checked reproducibility
* checked file list
* checked installing in docker
* checked signatures, licences, checksums

All good!

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:08 PM Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 non-binding. I installed it using Breeze and tested my set of sample
> example DAGs for standard and fab providers.
>
> *Ankit*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 2:17 PM Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Bugra Ozturk
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, 07:29 Amogh Desai, <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding.
> > >
> > > Performed the following checks:
> > >
> > > * Checked SVN
> > > * Checked in Docker
> > > * Checked reproducible package builds
> > > * Checked licenses
> > > * Checked signatures
> > >
> > > I installed the bits with breeze and tested my set of simple example
> > dags,
> > > mainly around the
> > > standard provider.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Amogh Desai
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM Jens Scheffler
> > <j_scheffler@gmx.de.invalid
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package
> > build,
> > > > Licenses, Signatures
> > > >
> > > > Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration test
> > > > Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very simplistic
> > test.
> > > >
> > > > On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote:
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> > is
> > > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> > > means
> > > > > that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3
> binding
> > +1
> > > > > votes have been received.
> > > > >
> > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > >
> > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > > > Provider
> > > > > distributions.
> > > > >
> > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > >   Python "wheel" release.
> > > > >
> > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > >
> > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> > RC
> > > is
> > > > > described in:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> community
> > > are
> > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398
> > > > >
> > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> > the
> > > RC
> > > > > candidates.
> > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > > documentation
> > > > > after the
> > > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Posted by Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding. I installed it using Breeze and tested my set of sample
example DAGs for standard and fab providers.

*Ankit*






On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 2:17 PM Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 non-binding
>
> Bugra Ozturk
>
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, 07:29 Amogh Desai, <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding.
> >
> > Performed the following checks:
> >
> > * Checked SVN
> > * Checked in Docker
> > * Checked reproducible package builds
> > * Checked licenses
> > * Checked signatures
> >
> > I installed the bits with breeze and tested my set of simple example
> dags,
> > mainly around the
> > standard provider.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM Jens Scheffler
> <j_scheffler@gmx.de.invalid
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package
> build,
> > > Licenses, Signatures
> > >
> > > Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration test
> > > Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very simplistic
> test.
> > >
> > > On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote:
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> is
> > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> > means
> > > > that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3 binding
> +1
> > > > votes have been received.
> > > >
> > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > >
> > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > >
> > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > > Provider
> > > > distributions.
> > > >
> > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > >   Python "wheel" release.
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > is
> > > > described in:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> > are
> > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > >
> > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> > > >
> > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398
> > > >
> > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> the
> > RC
> > > > candidates.
> > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > documentation
> > > > after the
> > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > >
> > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > >
> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Elad Kalif
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Posted by Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding

Bugra Ozturk

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, 07:29 Amogh Desai, <am...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 binding.
>
> Performed the following checks:
>
> * Checked SVN
> * Checked in Docker
> * Checked reproducible package builds
> * Checked licenses
> * Checked signatures
>
> I installed the bits with breeze and tested my set of simple example dags,
> mainly around the
> standard provider.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM Jens Scheffler <j_scheffler@gmx.de.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
> > Licenses, Signatures
> >
> > Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration test
> > Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very simplistic test.
> >
> > On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> means
> > > that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> > > votes have been received.
> > >
> > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >
> > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > >
> > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > Provider
> > > distributions.
> > >
> > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > >   Python "wheel" release.
> > >
> > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >
> > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> is
> > > described in:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >
> > >
> > > Public keys are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> are
> > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >
> > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> > >
> > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398
> > >
> > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> RC
> > > candidates.
> > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > documentation
> > > after the
> > > RC candidates are released.
> > >
> > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Elad Kalif
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org>.
+1 binding.

Performed the following checks:

* Checked SVN
* Checked in Docker
* Checked reproducible package builds
* Checked licenses
* Checked signatures

I installed the bits with breeze and tested my set of simple example dags,
mainly around the
standard provider.

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai


On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
> Licenses, Signatures
>
> Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration test
> Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very simplistic test.
>
> On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> > that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> > votes have been received.
> >
> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >
> > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >
> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> Provider
> > distributions.
> >
> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> >   Python "wheel" release.
> >
> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >
> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> > described in:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >
> >
> > Public keys are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >
> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> >
> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398
> >
> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> > candidates.
> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> documentation
> > after the
> > RC candidates are released.
> >
> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Elad Kalif
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 12, 2025

Posted by Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.INVALID>.
+1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, 
Licenses, Signatures

Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration test 
Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very simplistic test.

On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> votes have been received.
>
> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>
> Airflow Providers are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>
> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider
> distributions.
>
> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>   Python "wheel" release.
>
> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>
> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> described in:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>
>
> Public keys are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
>
> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398
>
> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> candidates.
> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
> after the
> RC candidates are released.
>
> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/
>
> Cheers,
> Elad Kalif
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org