Bug?

[Steven Leija <St...@valtech.com>]

Hello All,
 
I've developed many forms using only the standard attribute of "action" in
my <html:form> tag.  Today I started on a new form, and after six hours of
banging my head, I found out that I had to add the "type" and "name"
attribute to my <html:form> tag.  Is this a bug?  My other forms work just
fine without these, but when dealing with this form, it required me to put
these attributes into the tag.  With my other forms, I was using beans from
the following package:
 

com.steven.MyForm

 
and with the new form I was using a Form from the following package:
 

com.vfs.action.BeneficiaryForm

 
Is this because of the package difference?  Please let me know and save my
sanity!

Have a good one, 

Steven 

 

Re: Bug?

[suhas <su...@techmas.hcltech.com>]

suppose u have something like this in Jsp
<html:form action="/someAction.do">

In this case u need not to mention the name and type attribute for the
<html:form> tag
But  there should be some action mapping in the struts-config.xml file which
points to form to be used .
I mean
<form-bean name="myForm"
                   type="mycompany.mypackage.myForm">

<action-mapping>
<action path="/someAction"
            type=""mycompany.mypackage.myAction"
            name="myForm" />
</action-mapping>

So when the <html:form action="/someAction.do"> gets parsed it will
definitely try to look for form ("myForm") based on the struts.xml file .

Regards
Suhas





----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Q. Ma <mi...@soprano.com.au>
To: <st...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: <html:form> Bug?


> Have you associate a particular FormBean with the new action defined in
> your <html:form> tag, I mean check your struts-config.xml file.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Leija" <St...@valtech.com>
> To: <st...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 9:07 AM
> Subject: <html:form> Bug?
>
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I've developed many forms using only the standard attribute of
> "action" in
> > my <html:form> tag.  Today I started on a new form, and after six
> hours of
> > banging my head, I found out that I had to add the "type" and "name"
> > attribute to my <html:form> tag.  Is this a bug?  My other forms work
> just
> > fine without these, but when dealing with this form, it required me to
> put
> > these attributes into the tag.  With my other forms, I was using beans
> from
> > the following package:
> >
> >
> > com.steven.MyForm
> >
> >
> > and with the new form I was using a Form from the following package:
> >
> >
> > com.vfs.action.BeneficiaryForm
> >
> >
> > Is this because of the package difference?  Please let me know and
> save my
> > sanity!
> >
> > Have a good one,
> >
> > Steven
> >
> >
> >

Re: Bug?

["Michael Q. Ma" <mi...@soprano.com.au>]

Have you associate a particular FormBean with the new action defined in
your <html:form> tag, I mean check your struts-config.xml file.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Leija" <St...@valtech.com>
To: <st...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 9:07 AM
Subject: <html:form> Bug?


> Hello All,
>
> I've developed many forms using only the standard attribute of
"action" in
> my <html:form> tag.  Today I started on a new form, and after six
hours of
> banging my head, I found out that I had to add the "type" and "name"
> attribute to my <html:form> tag.  Is this a bug?  My other forms work
just
> fine without these, but when dealing with this form, it required me to
put
> these attributes into the tag.  With my other forms, I was using beans
from
> the following package:
>
>
> com.steven.MyForm
>
>
> and with the new form I was using a Form from the following package:
>
>
> com.vfs.action.BeneficiaryForm
>
>
> Is this because of the package difference?  Please let me know and
save my
> sanity!
>
> Have a good one,
>
> Steven
>
>
>