You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com> on 2015/03/05 18:37:45 UTC
[DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection strategy and buffering messages
STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users. I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to the changes above, it includes all the new security features and numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for a full list).
Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 release.
Thoughts?
-Taylor
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Harsha <st...@harsha.io>.
Sorry for the late reply. I am +1 on releasing 0.9.4 . For 0.10.0 I would like to include this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
Thanks,
Harsha
On March 11, 2015 at 1:52:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgoetz@gmail.com) wrote:
Sorry for the late reply. I am +1 on releasing 0.9.4 . For 0.10.0 I would like include this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
Thanks,
Harsha
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Harsha <st...@harsha.io>.
Hi,
For storm 0.10.0 please add if you want any JIRAs that should be included.
I want to include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
Thanks,
Harsha
On March 12, 2015 at 9:30:25 AM, T B (thomasb23@arcor.de) wrote:
Hi,
For storm 0.10.0 please add if you want any JIRAs that should be included.
I want to include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
Thanks,
Harsha
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Derek Dagit <de...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
I appreciate it,
--
Derek
From: P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
To: dev@storm.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Thanks Derek. Noted.
I’ll give that patch some time for others to comment, and make sure it gets included.
-Taylor
On Mar 20, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Derek Dagit <de...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
I'd like STORM-714, created recently.
It is a UI style sheet change to keep things looking OK with recent changes.
Otherwise it really bothers me :)
--
Derek
From: Harsha <st...@harsha.io>
To: dev@storm.apache.org; P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Taylor,
STORM-617 is on me I’ll send a patch in next couple of days.
Thanks,
Harsha
On March 19, 2015 at 1:05:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgoetz@gmail.com) wrote:
With the VOTE underway for a 0.9.4 release ( if you have time, please evaluate the RC and vote accordingly), I’d like to turn our attention toward the 0.10.0 release.
I’d appreciate feedback on the state of the 0.10.0 (master) branch, especially from those who have been involved in developing the security-related features (which is one of the primary features of this branch).
Personally, I know of several organizations that are using a build of 0.10.0 successfully in production with security enabled. The main issue I’ve seen people struggle with is not a problem with code itself, but rather difficulties in setting up a secure cluster and interacting with other systems that are secured with Kerberos. I see that as more of a documentation issue, and not something that should block a release.
One feature that I think is essential for 0.10.0 is STORM-634 [1] (support for rolling upgrades), which was recently merged. This should make post-0.10.0 upgrades a lot less painful for users.
Based on the feedback received thus far, it looks like all the suggested patches have either been merged or are ready to be merged, with the exception of STORM-617 [2] (no patch available yet).
Should we wait for STORM-617? Any other patch suggestions?
-Taylor
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-634
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
On Mar 12, 2015, at 12:29 PM, T B <th...@arcor.de> wrote:
> +1 for releasing 0.9.4
>
> Thomas
>
> On 11 March 2015 at 21:39, Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to
>> documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM
>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of
>> your suggestions for the releases.
>>
>> Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move
>> forward with releasing?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and
>>> one essential feature PRs.
>>>
>>> - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
>>> -- It fixes connection pool issue.
>>> - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
>>> -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
>>> storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance
>>>> release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
>>>>
>>>> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>>>>
>>>> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving
>>>> reconnection strategy and buffering messages
>>>> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
>>>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>>>>
>>>> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
>>>> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
>>>> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional
>>>> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
>>>>
>>>> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to
>>>> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and
>>>> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch
>> for a full list).
>>>>
>>>> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
>>>> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
>>>>
>>>> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is
>>>> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with
>> 0.9.4 release.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -Taylor
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Name : 임 정택
>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter
>>> : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Derek. Noted.
I’ll give that patch some time for others to comment, and make sure it gets included.
-Taylor
On Mar 20, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Derek Dagit <de...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> I'd like STORM-714, created recently.
>
> It is a UI style sheet change to keep things looking OK with recent changes.
>
> Otherwise it really bothers me :)
>
> --
> Derek
>
> From: Harsha <st...@harsha.io>
> To: dev@storm.apache.org; P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
>
> Taylor,
> STORM-617 is on me I’ll send a patch in next couple of days.
>
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>
>
>
>
> On March 19, 2015 at 1:05:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgoetz@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> With the VOTE underway for a 0.9.4 release ( if you have time, please evaluate the RC and vote accordingly), I’d like to turn our attention toward the 0.10.0 release.
>
> I’d appreciate feedback on the state of the 0.10.0 (master) branch, especially from those who have been involved in developing the security-related features (which is one of the primary features of this branch).
>
> Personally, I know of several organizations that are using a build of 0.10.0 successfully in production with security enabled. The main issue I’ve seen people struggle with is not a problem with code itself, but rather difficulties in setting up a secure cluster and interacting with other systems that are secured with Kerberos. I see that as more of a documentation issue, and not something that should block a release.
>
> One feature that I think is essential for 0.10.0 is STORM-634 [1] (support for rolling upgrades), which was recently merged. This should make post-0.10.0 upgrades a lot less painful for users.
>
> Based on the feedback received thus far, it looks like all the suggested patches have either been merged or are ready to be merged, with the exception of STORM-617 [2] (no patch available yet).
>
> Should we wait for STORM-617? Any other patch suggestions?
>
> -Taylor
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-634
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
>
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 12:29 PM, T B <th...@arcor.de> wrote:
>
> > +1 for releasing 0.9.4
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > On 11 March 2015 at 21:39, Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to
> >> documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM
> >> To: dev@storm.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
> >>
> >> Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of
> >> your suggestions for the releases.
> >>
> >> Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move
> >> forward with releasing?
> >>
> >> -Taylor
> >>
> >> On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and
> >>> one essential feature PRs.
> >>>
> >>> - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
> >>> -- It fixes connection pool issue.
> >>> - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
> >>> -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
> >>>
> >>> Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
> >>> storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance
> >>>> release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
> >>>>
> >>>> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
> >>>>
> >>>> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving
> >>>> reconnection strategy and buffering messages
> >>>> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
> >>>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
> >>>>
> >>>> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
> >>>> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
> >>>> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional
> >>>> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
> >>>>
> >>>> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to
> >>>> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and
> >>>> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch
> >> for a full list).
> >>>>
> >>>> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
> >>>> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
> >>>>
> >>>> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is
> >>>> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with
> >> 0.9.4 release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Taylor
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Name : 임 정택
> >>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter
> >>> : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Derek Dagit <de...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
I'd like STORM-714, created recently.
It is a UI style sheet change to keep things looking OK with recent changes.
Otherwise it really bothers me :)
--
Derek
From: Harsha <st...@harsha.io>
To: dev@storm.apache.org; P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Taylor,
STORM-617 is on me I’ll send a patch in next couple of days.
Thanks,
Harsha
On March 19, 2015 at 1:05:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgoetz@gmail.com) wrote:
With the VOTE underway for a 0.9.4 release ( if you have time, please evaluate the RC and vote accordingly), I’d like to turn our attention toward the 0.10.0 release.
I’d appreciate feedback on the state of the 0.10.0 (master) branch, especially from those who have been involved in developing the security-related features (which is one of the primary features of this branch).
Personally, I know of several organizations that are using a build of 0.10.0 successfully in production with security enabled. The main issue I’ve seen people struggle with is not a problem with code itself, but rather difficulties in setting up a secure cluster and interacting with other systems that are secured with Kerberos. I see that as more of a documentation issue, and not something that should block a release.
One feature that I think is essential for 0.10.0 is STORM-634 [1] (support for rolling upgrades), which was recently merged. This should make post-0.10.0 upgrades a lot less painful for users.
Based on the feedback received thus far, it looks like all the suggested patches have either been merged or are ready to be merged, with the exception of STORM-617 [2] (no patch available yet).
Should we wait for STORM-617? Any other patch suggestions?
-Taylor
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-634
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
On Mar 12, 2015, at 12:29 PM, T B <th...@arcor.de> wrote:
> +1 for releasing 0.9.4
>
> Thomas
>
> On 11 March 2015 at 21:39, Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to
>> documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM
>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of
>> your suggestions for the releases.
>>
>> Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move
>> forward with releasing?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and
>>> one essential feature PRs.
>>>
>>> - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
>>> -- It fixes connection pool issue.
>>> - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
>>> -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
>>> storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance
>>>> release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
>>>>
>>>> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>>>>
>>>> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving
>>>> reconnection strategy and buffering messages
>>>> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
>>>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>>>>
>>>> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
>>>> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
>>>> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional
>>>> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
>>>>
>>>> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to
>>>> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and
>>>> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch
>> for a full list).
>>>>
>>>> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
>>>> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
>>>>
>>>> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is
>>>> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with
>> 0.9.4 release.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -Taylor
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Name : 임 정택
>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter
>>> : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Harsha <st...@harsha.io>.
Taylor,
STORM-617 is on me I’ll send a patch in next couple of days.
Thanks,
Harsha
On March 19, 2015 at 1:05:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgoetz@gmail.com) wrote:
With the VOTE underway for a 0.9.4 release ( if you have time, please evaluate the RC and vote accordingly), I’d like to turn our attention toward the 0.10.0 release.
I’d appreciate feedback on the state of the 0.10.0 (master) branch, especially from those who have been involved in developing the security-related features (which is one of the primary features of this branch).
Personally, I know of several organizations that are using a build of 0.10.0 successfully in production with security enabled. The main issue I’ve seen people struggle with is not a problem with code itself, but rather difficulties in setting up a secure cluster and interacting with other systems that are secured with Kerberos. I see that as more of a documentation issue, and not something that should block a release.
One feature that I think is essential for 0.10.0 is STORM-634 [1] (support for rolling upgrades), which was recently merged. This should make post-0.10.0 upgrades a lot less painful for users.
Based on the feedback received thus far, it looks like all the suggested patches have either been merged or are ready to be merged, with the exception of STORM-617 [2] (no patch available yet).
Should we wait for STORM-617? Any other patch suggestions?
-Taylor
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-634
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
On Mar 12, 2015, at 12:29 PM, T B <th...@arcor.de> wrote:
> +1 for releasing 0.9.4
>
> Thomas
>
> On 11 March 2015 at 21:39, Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to
>> documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM
>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of
>> your suggestions for the releases.
>>
>> Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move
>> forward with releasing?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and
>>> one essential feature PRs.
>>>
>>> - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
>>> -- It fixes connection pool issue.
>>> - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
>>> -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
>>> storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance
>>>> release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
>>>>
>>>> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>>>>
>>>> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving
>>>> reconnection strategy and buffering messages
>>>> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
>>>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>>>>
>>>> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
>>>> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
>>>> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional
>>>> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
>>>>
>>>> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to
>>>> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and
>>>> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch
>> for a full list).
>>>>
>>>> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
>>>> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
>>>>
>>>> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is
>>>> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with
>> 0.9.4 release.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -Taylor
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Name : 임 정택
>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter
>>> : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
With the VOTE underway for a 0.9.4 release ( if you have time, please evaluate the RC and vote accordingly), I’d like to turn our attention toward the 0.10.0 release.
I’d appreciate feedback on the state of the 0.10.0 (master) branch, especially from those who have been involved in developing the security-related features (which is one of the primary features of this branch).
Personally, I know of several organizations that are using a build of 0.10.0 successfully in production with security enabled. The main issue I’ve seen people struggle with is not a problem with code itself, but rather difficulties in setting up a secure cluster and interacting with other systems that are secured with Kerberos. I see that as more of a documentation issue, and not something that should block a release.
One feature that I think is essential for 0.10.0 is STORM-634 [1] (support for rolling upgrades), which was recently merged. This should make post-0.10.0 upgrades a lot less painful for users.
Based on the feedback received thus far, it looks like all the suggested patches have either been merged or are ready to be merged, with the exception of STORM-617 [2] (no patch available yet).
Should we wait for STORM-617? Any other patch suggestions?
-Taylor
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-634
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617
On Mar 12, 2015, at 12:29 PM, T B <th...@arcor.de> wrote:
> +1 for releasing 0.9.4
>
> Thomas
>
> On 11 March 2015 at 21:39, Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to
>> documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM
>> To: dev@storm.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of
>> your suggestions for the releases.
>>
>> Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move
>> forward with releasing?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and
>>> one essential feature PRs.
>>>
>>> - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
>>> -- It fixes connection pool issue.
>>> - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
>>> -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
>>> storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance
>>>> release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
>>>>
>>>> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>>>>
>>>> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving
>>>> reconnection strategy and buffering messages
>>>> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
>>>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>>>>
>>>> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
>>>> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
>>>> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional
>>>> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
>>>>
>>>> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to
>>>> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and
>>>> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch
>> for a full list).
>>>>
>>>> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
>>>> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
>>>>
>>>> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is
>>>> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with
>> 0.9.4 release.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -Taylor
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Name : 임 정택
>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter
>>> : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by T B <th...@arcor.de>.
+1 for releasing 0.9.4
Thomas
On 11 March 2015 at 21:39, Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to
> documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM
> To: dev@storm.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
>
> Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of
> your suggestions for the releases.
>
> Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move
> forward with releasing?
>
> -Taylor
>
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and
> > one essential feature PRs.
> >
> > - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
> > -- It fixes connection pool issue.
> > - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
> > -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
> >
> > Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
> > storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Regards
> > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> >
> >
> > 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance
> >> release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
> >>
> >> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
> >>
> >> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving
> >> reconnection strategy and buffering messages
> >> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
> >> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
> >>
> >> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
> >> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
> >> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional
> >> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
> >>
> >> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to
> >> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and
> >> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch
> for a full list).
> >>
> >> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
> >> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
> >>
> >> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is
> >> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with
> 0.9.4 release.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> -Taylor
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Name : 임 정택
> > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter
> > : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>
>
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net>.
Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
-----Original Message-----
From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM
To: dev@storm.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of your suggestions for the releases.
Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move forward with releasing?
-Taylor
On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and
> one essential feature PRs.
>
> - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
> -- It fixes connection pool issue.
> - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
> -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
>
> Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
> storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
>
> 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance
>> release) and 0.10.0 (security release).
>>
>> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>>
>> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving
>> reconnection strategy and buffering messages
>> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>>
>> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
>> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
>> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional
>> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
>>
>> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to
>> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and
>> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for a full list).
>>
>> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
>> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
>>
>> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is
>> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 release.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter
> : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn :
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of your suggestions for the releases.
Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move forward with releasing?
-Taylor
On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and one
> essential feature PRs.
>
> - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
> -- It fixes connection pool issue.
> - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
> -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
>
> Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
> storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
>
> 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance release)
>> and 0.10.0 (security release).
>>
>> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>>
>> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection
>> strategy and buffering messages
>> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>>
>> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
>> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
>> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional patches to
>> master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
>>
>> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to the
>> changes above, it includes all the new security features and numerous fixes
>> and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for a full list).
>>
>> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
>> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
>>
>> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is additional
>> work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 release.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by 임정택 <ka...@gmail.com>.
storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and one
essential feature PRs.
- bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690
-- It fixes connection pool issue.
- feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691
-- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary.
Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with
storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master.
Thanks!
Regards
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance release)
> and 0.10.0 (security release).
>
> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>
> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection
> strategy and buffering messages
> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>
> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m
> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional patches to
> master that should be considered for 0.9.4.
>
> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to the
> changes above, it includes all the new security features and numerous fixes
> and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for a full list).
>
> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing?
>
> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is additional
> work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 release.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Taylor
>
--
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Parth Brahmbhatt <pb...@hortonworks.com>.
I agree with Richard, in addition I think we should also include
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/437 once Nathan is on board with the
changes.
Thanks
Parth
On 3/5/15, 9:56 AM, "Richard Kellogg" <rm...@comcast.net> wrote:
>I believe the pull request attached to STORM-693
>(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-693) warrants inclusion.
>
>Could someone at least merge this into the trunk?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:38 PM
>To: dev@storm.apache.org
>Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
>
>I'd like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance release)
>and
>0.10.0 (security release).
>
>0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
>
> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection
>strategy and buffering messages
> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
>java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
>
>Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users.
>I'd
>be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I'm
>interested
>in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional patches to master
>that
>should be considered for 0.9.4.
>
>0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to the
>changes above, it includes all the new security features and numerous
>fixes
>and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for a full list).
>
>Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding
>bugs/patches
>should we consider before releasing?
>
>I'm fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is additional
>work
>to be done, but I'd like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 release.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>-Taylor
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
Posted by Richard Kellogg <rm...@comcast.net>.
I believe the pull request attached to STORM-693
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-693) warrants inclusion.
Could someone at least merge this into the trunk?
-----Original Message-----
From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgoetz@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:38 PM
To: dev@storm.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0
I'd like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance release) and
0.10.0 (security release).
0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes:
STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection
strategy and buffering messages
STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to
java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist.
Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users. I'd
be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I'm interested
in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional patches to master that
should be considered for 0.9.4.
0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to the
changes above, it includes all the new security features and numerous fixes
and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for a full list).
Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding bugs/patches
should we consider before releasing?
I'm fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is additional work
to be done, but I'd like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 release.
Thoughts?
-Taylor