You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Thomas Taroni (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/06/27 11:47:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-14601) Using [child] and [subquery]
DocTransformer / FieldList
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Thomas Taroni updated SOLR-14601:
---------------------------------
Description:
If you are using in the fl parameter something like that and luceneMatchVersion is higher or equals then 8.0.0 :
fl=*,[child],customer:[subquery] or
fl=*,customer:[subquery],[child]
It ends Up in any case in the following error (BadRequest) inside the SubQueryAugmenterFactory:
{code:java}
// code placeholder
if (conflictMap.containsKey(field)) {
throw new SolrException(ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST,"[subquery] name "+field+" is uplicated");
} else {
conflictMap.put(field, true);
}
{code}
It looks like that the following Snippet in ChildDocTransformerFactory(8.5.2 and 9.0.0) already have added that field to the context.
{code:java}
// code placeholder 8.5.2
String childReturnFields = params.get("fl");
SolrReturnFields childSolrReturnFields;
if(childReturnFields != null) {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(childReturnFields, req);
} else if(req.getSchema().getDefaultLuceneMatchVersion().major < 8) {
// ensure backwards for versions prior to SOLR 8
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields();
} else {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(req);
}
{code}
{code:java}
// code placeholder master 9.0.0
String childReturnFields = params.get("fl");
SolrReturnFields childSolrReturnFields;
if (childReturnFields != null) {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(childReturnFields, req);
} else {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(req);
}
{code}
It looks like childReturnFields includes also the customer:[subquery], eventually is a good idea to remove fields from other AugmenterFactories like [shard] or [subquery] from the childReturnFields variable
was:
If you are using in the fl parameter something like that and luceneMatchVersion is higher or equals then 8.0.0 :
fl=*,[child],customer:[subquery] or
fl=*,customer:[subquery],[child]
It ends Up in any case in the following error (BadRequest) inside the SubQueryAugmenterFactory:
{code:java}
// code placeholder
if (conflictMap.containsKey(field)) {
throw new SolrException(ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST,"[subquery] name "+field+" is uplicated");
} else {
conflictMap.put(field, true);
}
{code}
It looks like that the following Snippet in ChildDocTransformerFactory(8.5.2 and 9.0.0) already have added that field to the context.
{code:java}
// code placeholder 8.5.2
String childReturnFields = params.get("fl");
SolrReturnFields childSolrReturnFields;
if(childReturnFields != null) {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(childReturnFields, req);
} else if(req.getSchema().getDefaultLuceneMatchVersion().major < 8) {
// ensure backwards for versions prior to SOLR 8
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields();
} else {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(req);
}
{code}
{code:java}
// code placeholder master 9.0.0
String childReturnFields = params.get("fl");
SolrReturnFields childSolrReturnFields;
if (childReturnFields != null) {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(childReturnFields, req);
} else {
childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(req);
}
{code}
It looks like childReturnFields includes also the customer:[subquery], eventually is a good idea to remove fields from other AugmenterFactories like [shard] or [subquery]
> Using [child] and [subquery] DocTransformer / FieldList
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-14601
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14601
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: SearchComponents - other
> Affects Versions: master (9.0), 8.5.2
> Environment: Docker Container 8.5.2 from Docker Hub
> Already existing in 9.0.0
> Reporter: Thomas Taroni
> Priority: Major
>
> If you are using in the fl parameter something like that and luceneMatchVersion is higher or equals then 8.0.0 :
> fl=*,[child],customer:[subquery] or
> fl=*,customer:[subquery],[child]
> It ends Up in any case in the following error (BadRequest) inside the SubQueryAugmenterFactory:
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> if (conflictMap.containsKey(field)) {
> throw new SolrException(ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST,"[subquery] name "+field+" is uplicated");
> } else {
> conflictMap.put(field, true);
> }
> {code}
> It looks like that the following Snippet in ChildDocTransformerFactory(8.5.2 and 9.0.0) already have added that field to the context.
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder 8.5.2
> String childReturnFields = params.get("fl");
> SolrReturnFields childSolrReturnFields;
> if(childReturnFields != null) {
> childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(childReturnFields, req);
> } else if(req.getSchema().getDefaultLuceneMatchVersion().major < 8) {
> // ensure backwards for versions prior to SOLR 8
> childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields();
> } else {
> childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(req);
> }
> {code}
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder master 9.0.0
> String childReturnFields = params.get("fl");
> SolrReturnFields childSolrReturnFields;
> if (childReturnFields != null) {
> childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(childReturnFields, req);
> } else {
> childSolrReturnFields = new SolrReturnFields(req);
> }
> {code}
> It looks like childReturnFields includes also the customer:[subquery], eventually is a good idea to remove fields from other AugmenterFactories like [shard] or [subquery] from the childReturnFields variable
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org