You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> on 2010/10/20 17:09:34 UTC
Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
Hello;
As you have already know, we have released our 1.0.0 GA. This means that we have
to maintain 1.0_x branch, i.e whenever we commit to "trunk", if it is related
with "1.0_x" branch, we also have to commit that change to 1.0_x branch.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
Posted by Joseph Bergmark <be...@apache.org>.
I agree as well. I suspect most of the time it will be clear what is a bug
fix and what is a feature. If it isn't clear, then it doesn't hurt to ask.
Sincerely,
Joe
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> From: Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, October 20, 2010 7:10:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > small addendum: we must _only_ touch the 1.0.x branch if this is really
> an
> >important issue. That means, a blocker or something similar.
> >
> > All new features + improving capabilities should _only_ be done in
> >1.1.0-SNAPSHOT (aka our trunk).
> >
> > Whenever you hit an issue in 1.0.0 please _first_ ping the dev list
> whether
> >this should go into trunk or _also_ should get fixed in the 1.0.x branch.
> > I guess this will really be the exceptional case!
>
> EC :This requirement seems a bit onerous, can we say "if there's any
> question..."?
>
> +1. I think no need to ping dev list. If one strongly feels that not
> ensure for
> committing to the branch, we can discuss it.
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>
Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
From: Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Wed, October 20, 2010 7:10:51 PM
Subject: Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> small addendum: we must _only_ touch the 1.0.x branch if this is really an
>important issue. That means, a blocker or something similar.
>
> All new features + improving capabilities should _only_ be done in
>1.1.0-SNAPSHOT (aka our trunk).
>
> Whenever you hit an issue in 1.0.0 please _first_ ping the dev list whether
>this should go into trunk or _also_ should get fixed in the 1.0.x branch.
> I guess this will really be the exceptional case!
EC :This requirement seems a bit onerous, can we say "if there's any
question..."?
+1. I think no need to ping dev list. If one strongly feels that not ensure for
committing to the branch, we can discuss it.
--Gurkan
Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
yes sure :)
Maybe my words were too strong - feel free to write any objections if you think we should treat 1.0.x more liberal!
The important thing to me is that we have the same understanding about the fundamental direction about what should land in the 1.0.x branch and what should went into trunk.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 10/20/10, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 4:10 PM
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM,
> Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> > small addendum: we must _only_ touch the 1.0.x branch
> if this is really an important issue. That means, a blocker
> or something similar.
> >
> > All new features + improving capabilities should
> _only_ be done in 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT (aka our trunk).
> >
> > Whenever you hit an issue in 1.0.0 please _first_ ping
> the dev list whether this should go into trunk or _also_
> should get fixed in the 1.0.x branch.
> > I guess this will really be the exceptional case!
>
> This requirement seems a bit onerous, can we say "if
> there's any question..."?
>
Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> small addendum: we must _only_ touch the 1.0.x branch if this is really an important issue. That means, a blocker or something similar.
>
> All new features + improving capabilities should _only_ be done in 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT (aka our trunk).
>
> Whenever you hit an issue in 1.0.0 please _first_ ping the dev list whether this should go into trunk or _also_ should get fixed in the 1.0.x branch.
> I guess this will really be the exceptional case!
This requirement seems a bit onerous, can we say "if there's any question..."?
Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
small addendum: we must _only_ touch the 1.0.x branch if this is really an important issue. That means, a blocker or something similar.
All new features + improving capabilities should _only_ be done in 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT (aka our trunk).
Whenever you hit an issue in 1.0.0 please _first_ ping the dev list whether this should go into trunk or _also_ should get fixed in the 1.0.x branch.
I guess this will really be the exceptional case!
This will guarantee that we keep 1.0.x as stable as possible!
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 10/20/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 3:09 PM
> Hello;
>
> As you have already know, we have released our 1.0.0 GA.
> This means that we have
> to maintain 1.0_x branch, i.e whenever we commit to
> "trunk", if it is related
> with "1.0_x" branch, we also have to commit that change to
> 1.0_x branch.
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>