You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Yun Tang (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/09 18:41:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-15104) Performance regression on
4.12.2019 in RocksDB benchmarks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17012141#comment-17012141 ]
Yun Tang commented on FLINK-15104:
----------------------------------
I verified benchmark on [Flink-dd8298|https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/dd82989e6cba7cd2dee1fdf013a67a163dfcb849] which bump FRocksDB version locally again. The idea is to compare the performance of Flink with FRocksDB 5.17.2-artisans-1.0 and 5.17.2-artisans-2.0. And result behaves not difference.
[~pnowojski] I prefer to close this issue and wait for if any users would complain RocksDB performance regression via mail list.
> Performance regression on 4.12.2019 in RocksDB benchmarks
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-15104
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15104
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Benchmarks, Runtime / State Backends
> Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
> Assignee: Yun Tang
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> A potential small performance regression that happened either on December 4th or 5th:
> http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8000/timeline/?ben=stateBackends.ROCKS&env=2
> http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8000/timeline/?ben=stateBackends.ROCKS_INC&env=2
> it doesn't seem to be visible in the states benchmarks suites, which might be an issue on its own.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)