You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com> on 2006/05/11 08:25:14 UTC
rename the "configuration" element in config.xml file ?
I noticed we still have a "configuration" element in the config.xml file.
I am thinking of doing the following for 1.1:
* most importantly, change the "configuration" element name to "module"
to have consistent terminology considering the recent configId changes.
* update cmd line help for --override option in Daemon to use "module"
terminology.
* update the wording in the var\config\README.txt to use the "module"
terminology.
* change the --long startup output to use the word "Module" instead of
"Configuration" - also give us a bit more room on each line.
Any objections?
John
Re: rename the "configuration" element in config.xml file ?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
John,
I think making those changes as well makes sense. f we don't get to a level of consistency then I
think we missed the objective :)
John Sisson wrote:
> I noticed we still have a "configuration" element in the config.xml file.
> I am thinking of doing the following for 1.1:
>
> * most importantly, change the "configuration" element name to "module"
> to have consistent terminology considering the recent configId changes.
> * update cmd line help for --override option in Daemon to use "module"
> terminology.
> * update the wording in the var\config\README.txt to use the "module"
> terminology.
> * change the --long startup output to use the word "Module" instead of
> "Configuration" - also give us a bit more room on each line.
>
> Any objections?
>
> John
>
>
>
Re: rename the "configuration" element in config.xml file ?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
I created a JIRA for this issue so that we had a place to put Dain's
patch until SVN is back up.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2012
Joe
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On May 10, 2006, at 11:25 PM, John Sisson wrote:
>
>> I noticed we still have a "configuration" element in the config.xml
>> file.
>> I am thinking of doing the following for 1.1:
>>
>> * most importantly, change the "configuration" element name to
>> "module" to have consistent terminology considering the recent
>> configId changes.
>
>
> I have a commit (since svn went down) for this one. My code supports
> the both 1.0 (configuration) and 1.1 (module) formats.
>
>> * update cmd line help for --override option in Daemon to use
>> "module" terminology.
>> * update the wording in the var\config\README.txt to use the "module"
>> terminology.
>> * change the --long startup output to use the word "Module" instead
>> of "Configuration" - also give us a bit more room on each line.
>
>
> +1
>
> -dain
>
>
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot
lose." -- Jim Elliot
Re: rename the "configuration" element in config.xml file ?
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On May 10, 2006, at 11:25 PM, John Sisson wrote:
> I noticed we still have a "configuration" element in the config.xml
> file.
> I am thinking of doing the following for 1.1:
>
> * most importantly, change the "configuration" element name to
> "module" to have consistent terminology considering the recent
> configId changes.
I have a commit (since svn went down) for this one. My code supports
the both 1.0 (configuration) and 1.1 (module) formats.
> * update cmd line help for --override option in Daemon to use
> "module" terminology.
> * update the wording in the var\config\README.txt to use the
> "module" terminology.
> * change the --long startup output to use the word "Module" instead
> of "Configuration" - also give us a bit more room on each line.
+1
-dain