You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/03/18 07:02:16 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] s9514171 opened a new pull request #4913: NIFI-8300 Make non-source processors invalid if scheduled for Primary…

s9514171 opened a new pull request #4913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4913


   … Node only
   
   #### Description of PR
   
   Set the processor state to invalid, when the processor has upstream connection and set to "Primary node only"
   
   ### For all changes:
   - [X] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
        in the commit message?
   
   - [X] Does your PR title start with **NIFI-XXXX** where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
   
   - [X] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically `main`)?
   
   - [X] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? _Additional commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking. Do not `squash` or use `--force` when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes._
   
   ### For code changes:
   - [X] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via `mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install` at the root `nifi` folder?
   - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
   - [X] Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 8?
   - [X] Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 11?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE` file, including the main `LICENSE` file under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `NOTICE` file, including the main `NOTICE` file found under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added `.displayName` in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
   
   ### For documentation related changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
   
   ### Note:
   Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [nifi] s9514171 commented on pull request #4913: NIFI-8300 Make non-source processors invalid if scheduled for Primary…

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
s9514171 commented on pull request #4913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4913#issuecomment-802031200


   Thanks for your review @markap14 , it looks better now 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [nifi] markap14 commented on pull request #4913: NIFI-8300 Make non-source processors invalid if scheduled for Primary…

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
markap14 commented on pull request #4913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4913#issuecomment-802888246


   Thanks @s9514171 ! Looks good to me too. +1 merged to main!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [nifi] markap14 closed pull request #4913: NIFI-8300 Make non-source processors invalid if scheduled for Primary…

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
markap14 closed pull request #4913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4913


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [nifi] markap14 commented on a change in pull request #4913: NIFI-8300 Make non-source processors invalid if scheduled for Primary…

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
markap14 commented on a change in pull request #4913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4913#discussion_r596951761



##########
File path: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-components/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/StandardProcessorNode.java
##########
@@ -1090,6 +1090,16 @@ public int getActiveThreadCount() {
                     break;
                 }
             }
+
+            // Ensure that execution node will not be misused
+            if (getExecutionNode() == ExecutionNode.PRIMARY) {
+                if (getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_REQUIRED
+                        || getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_ALLOWED && !getIncomingConnections().isEmpty()) {
+                    results.add(new ValidationResult.Builder()
+                            .explanation("Processor should set to run on all nodes.")

Review comment:
       Probably need to provide more details in the explanation. Why should the processor be set to run on all nodes? Perhaps something to the effect of "Processors with incoming connections cannot be scheduled for Primary Node Only."

##########
File path: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-components/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/StandardProcessorNode.java
##########
@@ -1090,6 +1090,16 @@ public int getActiveThreadCount() {
                     break;
                 }
             }
+
+            // Ensure that execution node will not be misused
+            if (getExecutionNode() == ExecutionNode.PRIMARY) {
+                if (getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_REQUIRED
+                        || getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_ALLOWED && !getIncomingConnections().isEmpty()) {

Review comment:
       I think this can be simplified to just: `if (getExecutionNode() == ExecutionNode.PRIMARY && hasIncomingConnection()) {`




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org