[DISCUSS] FINERACT-2607: Add missing status enum values for command processing results

[Hysnije Zllanoga <hy...@gmail.com>]

Hi Fineract community,

My name is Hysnije, and I am a new contributor to Apache Fineract.

I noticed that the r_enum_value table was missing status
values for command processing results, causing the
"/audits/searchtemplate" endpoint to return an incomplete list of
processing statuses.

I opened JIRA issue FINERACT-2607
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2607> and submitted PR
#5852 to fix this:
https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/5852

A reviewer suggested I discuss this on the mailing list before
proceeding, since it involves changes to existing schema values.
I would appreciate any feedback or guidance from the community.

Thank you!

Re: [DISCUSS] FINERACT-2607: Add missing status enum values for command processing results

[Hysnije Zllanoga <hy...@gmail.com>]

I just noticed that the values were already stored under a different name
"processing_result_enum" so this migration is not needed, but we just need
to fix the enum name. Adapted the PR.
This migration and discussion is not relevant anymore.

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 1:35 PM Hysnije Zllanoga <
hysnijee.zllanoga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Fineract community,
>
> My name is Hysnije, and I am a new contributor to Apache Fineract.
>
> I noticed that the r_enum_value table was missing status
> values for command processing results, causing the
> "/audits/searchtemplate" endpoint to return an incomplete list of
> processing statuses.
>
> I opened JIRA issue FINERACT-2607
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2607> and submitted PR
> #5852 to fix this:
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/5852
>
> A reviewer suggested I discuss this on the mailing list before
> proceeding, since it involves changes to existing schema values.
> I would appreciate any feedback or guidance from the community.
>
> Thank you!
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Hysnije