Re: [TRINIDAD] 1.2.4-branch is ready...

[Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com>]

putting Trinidad in the subject because I forgot to originally.

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> next is "testing" and prepare a release candidate.
> 
> by end of next week (if all agree) I can provide a 124 RC
> so, we have some time to test. If we need more time, no
> big deal in waiting some more days :-)
> 
> -M
> 
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:48 PM, Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> My vote is still to make 1.2 the trunk, and not have two trunks.
>> By the way, I created 1.2.4-branch, and did the merge and did a quick
>> test by following Adam's directions on the wiki page. Matthias, what is
>> the next step in the process?
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TrinidadCreating12Branches
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeanne
>>
>> Andrew Robinson wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Getting the ball rolling :)
>>>
>>> On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Vote:
>>>>   Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
>>>>
>>>> Justification:
>>>> Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
>>>> I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
>>>> them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
>>>> Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
>>>> example as an argument to use as a standard:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
>>>>
>>>> If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
>>>>
>>>> Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
>>>> remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
>>>> supported.
>>>>
>>>> Benefits:
>>>> 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
>>>> 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
>>>> 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
>>>> more stable product
>>>>
>>>> -Andrew
>>>>
> 
> 
>