You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by "Bruno P. Kinoshita" <ki...@apache.org> on 2018/09/08 12:57:52 UTC
[imaging] Questions about the 1.0-alpha release
Hi all,
I am almost done following the docs to prepare a release. Didn't struggle as much as I expected with the release-plugin. Had more trouble getting the MANIFEST.MF entries corrected.
But now, before I create the dist tag, and upload the zip/tar.gz (this was not executed by the release plugin because... it's a project that uses assembly plugin I think), I would like to confirm a few things
- The version release is 1.0-alpha
- The changes.xml is for 1.0. I found that commons-lang appears to have had a 3.0-beta. The changes.xml contains the entries for 3.0, with an HTML comment showing which changes were added post 3.0-beta. So I did the same for imaging
- RELEASE-NOTES.txt is still saying 1.0... should it be 1.0-alpha?
- What else would need to be updated? The site perhaps??? Or is it OK to have a few places showing 1.0?
I have time to work on the RC1 vote until Monday NZ time this week. So if I manage to get these points sorted, we might be able to call the RC1 vote, and leave it running until the next weekend - or cancel it during the week in case of an error, and then I could prepare RC2 next weekend I think.
Thanks!
Bruno
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [imaging] Questions about the 1.0-alpha release
Posted by "Bruno P. Kinoshita" <ki...@apache.org>.
Thanks Gary. Had a bit of spare time today, so tried preparing a new release as alpha1.
Still have a few questions from last e-mail pending, but will call the vote anyway and just re-roll a rc2 later if necessary.
>- RELEASE-NOTES.txt is still saying 1.0... should it be 1.0-alpha?
>- What else would need to be updated? The site perhaps??? Or is it OK to have a few places showing 1.0?
Vote e-mail coming in a few minutes (hopefully).
Cheers
Bruno
________________________________
From: Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <de...@commons.apache.org>; Bruno P. Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, 9 September 2018 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: [imaging] Questions about the 1.0-alpha release
I would call it "alpha1" instead of just "alpha".
Gary
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 06:58 Bruno P. Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi all,
>
>I am almost done following the docs to prepare a release. Didn't struggle as much as I expected with the release-plugin. Had more trouble getting the MANIFEST.MF entries corrected.
>
>But now, before I create the dist tag, and upload the zip/tar.gz (this was not executed by the release plugin because... it's a project that uses assembly plugin I think), I would like to confirm a few things
>
>- The version release is 1.0-alpha
>- The changes.xml is for 1.0. I found that commons-lang appears to have had a 3.0-beta. The changes.xml contains the entries for 3.0, with an HTML comment showing which changes were added post 3.0-beta. So I did the same for imaging
>- RELEASE-NOTES.txt is still saying 1.0... should it be 1.0-alpha?
>- What else would need to be updated? The site perhaps??? Or is it OK to have a few places showing 1.0?
>
>I have time to work on the RC1 vote until Monday NZ time this week. So if I manage to get these points sorted, we might be able to call the RC1 vote, and leave it running until the next weekend - or cancel it during the week in case of an error, and then I could prepare RC2 next weekend I think.
>
>
>Thanks!
>Bruno
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [imaging] Questions about the 1.0-alpha release
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
I would call it "alpha1" instead of just "alpha".
Gary
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 06:58 Bruno P. Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am almost done following the docs to prepare a release. Didn't struggle
> as much as I expected with the release-plugin. Had more trouble getting the
> MANIFEST.MF entries corrected.
>
> But now, before I create the dist tag, and upload the zip/tar.gz (this was
> not executed by the release plugin because... it's a project that uses
> assembly plugin I think), I would like to confirm a few things
>
> - The version release is 1.0-alpha
> - The changes.xml is for 1.0. I found that commons-lang appears to have
> had a 3.0-beta. The changes.xml contains the entries for 3.0, with an HTML
> comment showing which changes were added post 3.0-beta. So I did the same
> for imaging
> - RELEASE-NOTES.txt is still saying 1.0... should it be 1.0-alpha?
> - What else would need to be updated? The site perhaps??? Or is it OK to
> have a few places showing 1.0?
>
> I have time to work on the RC1 vote until Monday NZ time this week. So if
> I manage to get these points sorted, we might be able to call the RC1 vote,
> and leave it running until the next weekend - or cancel it during the week
> in case of an error, and then I could prepare RC2 next weekend I think.
>
>
> Thanks!
> Bruno
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>