[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on pull request #1315: GH-1314 Bulk retrieval and caching with SERVICE clause

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

afs commented on PR #1315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1315#issuecomment-1201446139

   > For the namespace I would prefer `se: http://jena.apache.org/service-enhancer#` with a dash (`-`) but if you insist on underscore `_` it's also fine with me. I think there is no need to make things more complex by introducing further namespaces for functions / property functions / assembers.
   
   `-` (dash) is fine.
   
   > Should I move all IRIs introduced by the plugin to that namespace? - e.g. `se:DatasetServiceEnhancer` instead of `ja:DatasetServiceEnhancer`? This would make it more self-contained.
   
   Yes, that would be best.
   
   
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: pr-help@jena.apache.org