You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tiles.apache.org by Mck <mc...@apache.org> on 2011/06/22 10:26:00 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Promote Tiles 3 from sandbox
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:21 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
Before i post another vote to move sandbox to trunk.
It is necessary to have binding votes only from PMC for this particular
non-release-related vote?
~mck
Re: [VOTE] Promote Tiles 3 from sandbox
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Mck <mc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Before i post another vote to move sandbox to trunk.
> It is necessary to have binding votes only from PMC for this particular
> non-release-related vote?
Nope, in fact it doesn't *really* need a vote, (unless we have project
guidelines somewhere that say it does,) just consensus on moving it
out of sandbox and where to put it.
For example it might make sense to call it the tiles-3.x branch until
everyone is comfortable with it being "the" Tiles trunk. But it's all
just directories in subversion, so it's easy to move around.
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Promote Tiles 3 from sandbox
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2011/6/22 Mck <mc...@apache.org>
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 10:30 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > However the only thing that we may worry about is the number of binding
> > votes, the vote passes if there are at least 3 binding +1.
>
> Yes that was my worry.
> I was simply questioning the need for such formality?
> Moving sandbox to trunk can be considered just a "commit", a large
> commit that's looking for broader peer-review. But it doesn't require
> the formality of the release process does it?
>
Probably not, moving sandboxed stuff to trunk is a reversable operation
after all.
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] Promote Tiles 3 from sandbox
Posted by Mck <mc...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 10:30 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> However the only thing that we may worry about is the number of binding
> votes, the vote passes if there are at least 3 binding +1.
Yes that was my worry.
I was simply questioning the need for such formality?
Moving sandbox to trunk can be considered just a "commit", a large
commit that's looking for broader peer-review. But it doesn't require
the formality of the release process does it?
Anyway it was more a question of curiosity...
~mck
Re: [VOTE] Promote Tiles 3 from sandbox
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
Only releases need 3 +1 votes. All other votes are lazy majority. :)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/6/22 Mck <mc...@apache.org>
>
>> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:21 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> >
>> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>> >
>>
>> Before i post another vote to move sandbox to trunk.
>> It is necessary to have binding votes only from PMC for this particular
>> non-release-related vote?
>>
>>
> AFAIK binding votes are only from PMC members, however votes from committers
> are taken seriously, don't worry :-) I think that no PMC is so sadistic to
> vote against a well done job.
> However the only thing that we may worry about is the number of binding
> votes, the vote passes if there are at least 3 binding +1.
>
> Antonio
>
Re: [VOTE] Promote Tiles 3 from sandbox
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2011/6/22 Mck <mc...@apache.org>
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:21 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
>
> Before i post another vote to move sandbox to trunk.
> It is necessary to have binding votes only from PMC for this particular
> non-release-related vote?
>
>
AFAIK binding votes are only from PMC members, however votes from committers
are taken seriously, don't worry :-) I think that no PMC is so sadistic to
vote against a well done job.
However the only thing that we may worry about is the number of binding
votes, the vote passes if there are at least 3 binding +1.
Antonio