You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2008/05/18 21:12:25 UTC
Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance
if there are FP issues with current FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, could you
open a bug and attach samples there?
--j.
mouss writes:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >>
> >>>> mouss wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Please show full headers of the message.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> actually, you don't need to. your message to the list
> >>>> has the same "pattern".
> >>>>
> >>>> the question is whether something is (re)writing the
> >>>> message-id or if this a new outlook message-id format?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> > I'm suggesting that OE uses this simple format now, and SA should adapt. I have no anti-virus or other software besides what windows delivers to edit my messages. OE sends the message to my postfix, which sends it to the configured smarthost.
> >
> > No antivirus whatsoever. My posfix handles that with Amavis. Amavis is there, but I don't think it edits my Message-ID's.. I have not upgraded that for ages.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> I installed SP3 and tried with OE (default configuration, as I don't use
> it). The message-id is indeed similar to those posted on the list
> before. see copy of message below.
>
> A quick & dirty fix is to cancel the score of FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK with:
>
> header __OE_MSGID_5 MESSAGEID =~ /^<[A-Fa-f0-9]{32}\@/m
> meta TEMP_FIX_OE_FORGED (__FORGED_OE && __OE_MSGID_5)
> score TEMP_FIX_OE_FORGED -4.199 -4.199 -2.963 -3.116
>
>
> A cleaner way is to update 20_ratware:
>
> # Outlook Express 4, 5, and
> 6
>
> ...
>
>
> header __OE_MSGID_5 MESSAGEID =~ /^<[A-Fa-f0-9]{32}\@/m
> meta __FORGED_OE (__OE_MUA && !__OE_MSGID_1 &&
> !__OE_MSGID_2 && !__OE_MSGID_3 && !__OE_MSGID_4 && !__OE_MSGID_5 &&
> !__UNUSABLE_MSGID)
>
> Jari, you should open a PR on
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/
>
>
> ----------------- copy of message generated by OE (win xp, SP3).
>
> Return-Path: <mo...@netoyen.net>
> Delivered-To: mouss@netoyen.net
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netoyen.net
> X-Spam-Flag: NO
> X-Spam-Score: 4.211
> X-Spam-Level: ****
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.211 required=5 tests=[COUNTRY_FR=0.01,
> DK_POLICY_TESTING=0.001, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=4.199, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
> Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30])
> by imlil.netoyen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768113ACDB37
> for <mo...@netoyen.net>; Sun, 18 May 2008 14:33:15 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9913EA0CC
> for <mo...@netoyen.net>; Sun, 18 May 2008 14:33:12 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from DADES (ouzoud.netoyen.net [82.239.111.75])
> by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CCF43EA0AC
> for <mo...@netoyen.net>; Sun, 18 May 2008 14:33:12 +0200 (CEST)
> Message-ID: <EB...@DADES>
> From: "mouss" <mo...@netoyen.net>
> To: <mo...@netoyen.net>
> Subject: test OE SP3
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 14:33:11 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C8B8F4.197A36F0"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C8B8F4.197A36F0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="windows-1256"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> OE SP3 test
> ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C8B8F4.197A36F0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="windows-1256"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Dwindows-1256">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>OE SP3 test</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C8B8F4.197A36F0--
Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance
Posted by mouss <mo...@netoyen.net>.
Justin Mason wrote:
> if there are FP issues with current FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, could you
> open a bug and attach samples there?
>
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5910