You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> on 2008/05/17 03:27:45 UTC
3.0 M4 artifacts
Sorry if I missed them, but have 3.0 M4 artifacts been generated or has the
tag just been created? If not, I could probably generate them while
reviewing Andrey's patches this weekend. If so, I'd just assume save myself
the work :-)
Thanks,
Kevin
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I think it would be useful to build an assembly by Hudson, but for the
reasons mentioned in this thread, it can only be a cross-platform
assembly.
Andrus
On May 18, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2008, at 3:04 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>>> Thanks for the info. Are we actually taking the Hudson builds as
>>> the
>>> released artifacts?
>>
>> No. And in fact there are no assemblies built by Hudson.
>
>
> Would it be useful if I have Hudson build the assemblies? Then we'd
> have 'nightlies' which are identical in composition to the releases.
> Will it be able to build the Mac assembly on a Solaris machine? (I
> seem to remember that the dmg creation needs OSX specific tools.)
>
> Ari
>
>
> -------------------------->
> ish
> http://www.ish.com.au
> Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On May 18, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> I believe that creating CayenneModeler.app (for OS X) is fine on any
> platform, but creating the disk image (.dmg) for OS X needs to be done
> on OS X. Under the assembly directory is a build-mac.sh which does it
> (using the hdiutil command).
Absolutely right.
> Can the Windows CayenneModeler.exe be produced on Solaris?
No. It requires Windows environment.
Andrus
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
I believe that creating CayenneModeler.app (for OS X) is fine on any
platform, but creating the disk image (.dmg) for OS X needs to be done
on OS X. Under the assembly directory is a build-mac.sh which does it
(using the hdiutil command).
Can the Windows CayenneModeler.exe be produced on Solaris?
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@ish.com.au> wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2008, at 3:04 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>>> Thanks for the info. Are we actually taking the Hudson builds as the
>>> released artifacts?
>>
>> No. And in fact there are no assemblies built by Hudson.
>
>
> Would it be useful if I have Hudson build the assemblies? Then we'd have
> 'nightlies' which are identical in composition to the releases. Will it be
> able to build the Mac assembly on a Solaris machine? (I seem to remember
> that the dmg creation needs OSX specific tools.)
>
> Ari
>
>
> -------------------------->
> ish
> http://www.ish.com.au
> Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@ish.com.au>.
On 18/05/2008, at 3:04 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Thanks for the info. Are we actually taking the Hudson builds as the
>> released artifacts?
>
> No. And in fact there are no assemblies built by Hudson.
Would it be useful if I have Hudson build the assemblies? Then we'd
have 'nightlies' which are identical in composition to the releases.
Will it be able to build the Mac assembly on a Solaris machine? (I
seem to remember that the dmg creation needs OSX specific tools.)
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Done.
On May 17, 2008, at 1:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> So Kevin you can go ahead with signed assemblies creation.
>
> Oops, wait... Still need to export the wikidocs. I'll send an email
> when this is done.
>
> Andrus
>
>
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On May 17, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> So Kevin you can go ahead with signed assemblies creation.
Oops, wait... Still need to export the wikidocs. I'll send an email
when this is done.
Andrus
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On May 17, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> On 5/17/08 3:11 AM, "Aristedes Maniatis" <ar...@ish.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Just the tag. Andrey's patches are going into trunk now and not M4.
>> Also, there is less of a need now to create snapshots for people to
>> test since Hudson effectively creates a snapshot for every commit (or
>> group of commits within a certain timeframe).
>
> Thanks for the info. Are we actually taking the Hudson builds as the
> released artifacts?
No. And in fact there are no assemblies built by Hudson.
> If not, we still need to build them and test them to ensure that
> what we make publicly available as a final released version is
> of high quality.
Yes, absolutely. As Ari said, Andrey's changes should go on trunk, so
that's not affecting M4. I am still finishing some internal testing,
but I think we are good to go with the assemblies. So Kevin you can go
ahead with signed assemblies creation.
Andrus
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
On 5/17/08 3:11 AM, "Aristedes Maniatis" <ar...@ish.com.au> wrote:
> Just the tag. Andrey's patches are going into trunk now and not M4.
> Also, there is less of a need now to create snapshots for people to
> test since Hudson effectively creates a snapshot for every commit (or
> group of commits within a certain timeframe).
Thanks for the info. Are we actually taking the Hudson builds as the
released artifacts? If not, we still need to build them and test them to
ensure that what we make publicly available as a final released version is
of high quality.
Note that testing here doesn't necessarily mean unit testing. I know
personally in the past I've botched the Modeler builds for Linux and
fortunately someone caught it in testing.
--
Kevin
Re: 3.0 M4 artifacts
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@ish.com.au>.
On 17/05/2008, at 11:27 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Sorry if I missed them, but have 3.0 M4 artifacts been generated or
> has the
> tag just been created? If not, I could probably generate them while
> reviewing Andrey's patches this weekend. If so, I'd just assume
> save myself
> the work :-)
Just the tag. Andrey's patches are going into trunk now and not M4.
Also, there is less of a need now to create snapshots for people to
test since Hudson effectively creates a snapshot for every commit (or
group of commits within a certain timeframe).
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A