You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hivemind.apache.org by "Joachim (PROGS)" <jo...@progs.be> on 2005/12/30 17:11:38 UTC
JBoss integration
What is the recommended way to integrate Hivemind in JBoss components?
Should I write a singleton mbean which serves as accesspoint to the
hivemind registry? Or are there better ways to handle this (or does such
a mbean already exists somewhere?)
Thanks for the help,
JOachim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Registry shutdown
Posted by Johan Lindquist <jo...@kawoo.co.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have now looked at the details of adding support for a custom shutdown
method and have come up with some rouge ideas and would like some input
for all of you if I am going down the right (or wrong) path.
1) Adding a shutdown-method attribute to the builder factory. This
would be default be null (i.e. no registration). If specified, must be
a valid, no-param method. This could also be a 'known' method name,
which would always be called (this could of course build up a large
number of references to services/methods). Thoughts?
2) Lookup and store the reference to the instance and method to invoke
(in the BuilderFactoryLogic class)
3) Remove the registration for shutdown in the service models
4) Allow the builder factory to query whether or not the instance
(service model) supports shutdown. Currently passes a boolean param to
the instance factory (as invoked from the service model).
5) Anything else?
Does this make sense? If so, I can add an issue in Jira and attach my
updates.
Thanks,
Johan
Johan Lindquist wrote:
> Whatever the name is, I would say this is something that would polish
> off the life cycle methods support. I'll raise an issue in Jira and
> have a peek to see what the changes required would be.
>
> On a different note, I was wondering what everyones thought would be on
> adding an 'before', 'after' and a 'name' attribute to the EagerLoad
> contribution point (similar to the interceptor contribution)? It would
> be great to be able to control te order of initialization and this adds
> a familiar way of doing so.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Johan
>
>
> James Carman wrote:
>
>> I probably would have used a method name like dispose() or shutdown() or
>>destroy() rather than registryDidShutdown() if you want to stress the
>>importance of removing a dependency (the "registry" part screams HiveMind).
>>But, your concern is a valid one. We have support for init methods, but not
>>destroy/shutdown methods.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:johan@kawoo.co.uk]
>>Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 12:09 PM
>>To: hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org
>>Subject: Registry shutdown
>>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Is there a particular reason for the RegistryShutdownListener interface?
>> Could this not be implemented just as the automagic initialization call
>>of the service? If a method on the implementation is named
>>'registryDidShutdown', add it automatically to the list of shutdown
>>listeners? Would nicely remove another compile time dependancy.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Johan
>>
>>--
>>you too?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDwkh41Tv8wj7aQ34RAq3PAJ92qsd4prChRvxqslrjWQ68nCK0+ACfViPu
muD7bTsk++eyzU94zCkHCR4=
=sHro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Registry shutdown
Posted by Johan Lindquist <jo...@kawoo.co.uk>.
Whatever the name is, I would say this is something that would polish
off the life cycle methods support. I'll raise an issue in Jira and
have a peek to see what the changes required would be.
On a different note, I was wondering what everyones thought would be on
adding an 'before', 'after' and a 'name' attribute to the EagerLoad
contribution point (similar to the interceptor contribution)? It would
be great to be able to control te order of initialization and this adds
a familiar way of doing so.
Cheers,
Johan
James Carman wrote:
> I probably would have used a method name like dispose() or shutdown() or
> destroy() rather than registryDidShutdown() if you want to stress the
> importance of removing a dependency (the "registry" part screams HiveMind).
> But, your concern is a valid one. We have support for init methods, but not
> destroy/shutdown methods.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:johan@kawoo.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 12:09 PM
> To: hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Registry shutdown
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a particular reason for the RegistryShutdownListener interface?
> Could this not be implemented just as the automagic initialization call
> of the service? If a method on the implementation is named
> 'registryDidShutdown', add it automatically to the list of shutdown
> listeners? Would nicely remove another compile time dependancy.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Johan
>
> --
> you too?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
--
you too?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: Registry shutdown
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
I probably would have used a method name like dispose() or shutdown() or
destroy() rather than registryDidShutdown() if you want to stress the
importance of removing a dependency (the "registry" part screams HiveMind).
But, your concern is a valid one. We have support for init methods, but not
destroy/shutdown methods.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:johan@kawoo.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 12:09 PM
To: hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Registry shutdown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Is there a particular reason for the RegistryShutdownListener interface?
Could this not be implemented just as the automagic initialization call
of the service? If a method on the implementation is named
'registryDidShutdown', add it automatically to the list of shutdown
listeners? Would nicely remove another compile time dependancy.
Cheers,
Johan
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDvVKf1Tv8wj7aQ34RAr9kAJ9fjHL8V50GVHca2dlGk6/E/w6y7wCePsGd
8s1B3mUnlPJUhixvCM65bVc=
=c6VH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Registry shutdown
Posted by Johan Lindquist <jo...@kawoo.co.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Is there a particular reason for the RegistryShutdownListener interface?
Could this not be implemented just as the automagic initialization call
of the service? If a method on the implementation is named
'registryDidShutdown', add it automatically to the list of shutdown
listeners? Would nicely remove another compile time dependancy.
Cheers,
Johan
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDvVKf1Tv8wj7aQ34RAr9kAJ9fjHL8V50GVHca2dlGk6/E/w6y7wCePsGd
8s1B3mUnlPJUhixvCM65bVc=
=c6VH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org