You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Karthik Kambatla (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/04 08:59:17 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-10043) Convert
org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager to be an AbstractService
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13812668#comment-13812668 ]
Karthik Kambatla commented on HADOOP-10043:
-------------------------------------------
May be a patch with all the required changes will help us decide if it is disruptive to convert {{SecretManager}} to an {{AbstractService}}. I suspect the change should be minimal if any to the HDFS SecretManagers.
[~ozawa]: are you able to post a patch based on the latest approach?
> Convert org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager to be an AbstractService
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10043
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10043
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
> Assignee: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
> Attachments: HADOOP-10043.1.patch, HADOOP-10043.2.patch, HADOOP-10043.3.patch, potential-approach.patch
>
>
> I'm dealing with YARN-1172, a subtask of YARN-1139(ResourceManager HA related task). The sentence as follows is a quoted from YARN-1172's my comment:
> {quote}
> I've found that it requires org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager to be an AbstractService,
> because both AbstractService and org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager are abstract class and we cannot extend both of them at the same time.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)