You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk...@kohsuke.org> on 2005/08/14 02:22:58 UTC
[javaflow] integrating the latest BCEL
Torsten,
When I instrument one of my classes with javaflow. I get a VerifyError
from JVM --- the instrumented code isn't correct.
While I haven't done much research on why/how, apparently the problem
only happens when I use the 2004/03/29 version of BCEL. If I use the
current trunk of BCEL as of today, the problem goes away.
The 2004/03/29 version is more than a year old now, so I'd imagine
there's been some bug fixes done since then. Now that BCEL has fixed
36110 (see [1]) at least to the point that our test cases won't break,
would it make sense to modify javaflow to use the current trunk version?
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36110
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [javaflow] integrating the latest BCEL
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
>
> Torsten,
>
> When I instrument one of my classes with javaflow. I get a
> VerifyError from JVM --- the instrumented code isn't correct.
>
> While I haven't done much research on why/how, apparently the
> problem only happens when I use the 2004/03/29 version of BCEL. If
> I use the current trunk of BCEL as of today, the problem goes away.
>
> The 2004/03/29 version is more than a year old now, so I'd imagine
> there's been some bug fixes done since then. Now that BCEL has
> fixed 36110 (see [1]) at least to the point that our test cases
> won't break, would it make sense to modify javaflow to use the
> current trunk version?
>
Sure!
If it works - go ahead :)
The BCEL version that
comes with javaflow just
had some bugs fixed.
Add that time I did not
have BCEL commit access.
cheers
--
Torsten