You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@impala.apache.org by "Tim Armstrong (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/11/16 01:04:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (IMPALA-9161) PlannerTest.testHbaseNoKeyEstimate failing

Tim Armstrong created IMPALA-9161:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: PlannerTest.testHbaseNoKeyEstimate failing
                 Key: IMPALA-9161
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9161
             Project: IMPALA
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Frontend
            Reporter: Tim Armstrong
            Assignee: Tim Armstrong


https://jenkins.impala.io/job/ubuntu-16.04-from-scratch/8792/testReport/junit/org.apache.impala.planner/PlannerTest/testHbaseNoKeyEstihttps://jenkins.impala.io/job/ubuntu-16.04-from-scratch/8792/testReport/junit/org.apache.impala.planner/PlannerTest/testHbaseNoKeyEstimate/

{noformat}

section SCANRANGELOCATIONS of query:
select * from functional_hbase.stringids
where id > '5'
and tinyint_col = 5
Actual does not match expected result:
  HBASE KEYRANGE 5\0:7
  HBASE KEYRANGE 7:9
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  HBASE KEYRANGE 9:<unbounded>
NODE 0:

Expected:
  HBASE KEYRANGE 5\0:7
  HBASE KEYRANGE 7:<unbounded>
NODE 0:
section SCANRANGELOCATIONS of query:
select * from functional_hbase.stringids
where id >= '5'
and tinyint_col = 5
Actual does not match expected result:
  HBASE KEYRANGE 5:7
  HBASE KEYRANGE 7:9
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  HBASE KEYRANGE 9:<unbounded>
{noformat}

I don't think this is the same as IMPALA-1995. Not sure if it's a change in output format or not.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)