You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Steve Loughran <st...@iseran.com> on 2003/02/20 20:54:40 UTC

Re: VOTE : Should we do this patch? (was RE: Request that zero length array interop patch be applied in ti me f or 1.1 final)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Daniels" <gd...@macromedia.com>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:21
Subject: VOTE : Should we do this patch? (was RE: Request that zero length
array interop patch be applied in ti me f or 1.1 final)


>
> OK committers, time to step up and decide this thing.
>
> Please vote +1 if you think we should reopen the bug and fix it by
applying the patch, -1 if you think we shouldn't, and +/-0 if you're
ambivalent.
>
> I myself am for including the patch, since it doesn't change our default
behavior, and does allow people who are having problems with buggy .NET
installations to get up and running, which at the end of the day is what
we're really hoping for anyway.  We should make sure there are comments
describing why it's there, but I see no harm in including it.
>
> So: +1

+1. Though Keith now owes us all a beer.


Re: VOTE : Should we do this patch? (was RE: Request that zero length array interop patch be applied in ti me f or 1.1 final)

Posted by James M Snell <ja...@us.ibm.com>.
Oy.... I'm closing my eyes and looking the other way......

- James Snell
     IBM Emerging Technologies
     jasnell@us.ibm.com
     (559) 587-1233 (office)
     (700) 544-9035 (t/l)
     Programming Web Services With SOAP
         O'Reilly & Associates, ISBN 0596000952

     Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. 
     Do not be terrified, do not be discouraged, for the Lord your 
     God will be with you whereever you go.    - Joshua 1:9



"Steve Loughran" <st...@iseran.com>
02/20/2003 11:54 AM
Please respond to axis-dev


To
<ax...@ws.apache.org>
cc

bcc

Subject
Re: VOTE : Should we do this patch? (was RE: Request that zero length 
array interop patch be applied in ti me f or 1.1 final)




----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Daniels" <gd...@macromedia.com>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:21
Subject: VOTE : Should we do this patch? (was RE: Request that zero length
array interop patch be applied in ti me f or 1.1 final)


>
> OK committers, time to step up and decide this thing.
>
> Please vote +1 if you think we should reopen the bug and fix it by
applying the patch, -1 if you think we shouldn't, and +/-0 if you're
ambivalent.
>
> I myself am for including the patch, since it doesn't change our default
behavior, and does allow people who are having problems with buggy .NET
installations to get up and running, which at the end of the day is what
we're really hoping for anyway.  We should make sure there are comments
describing why it's there, but I see no harm in including it.
>
> So: +1

+1. Though Keith now owes us all a beer.