You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@camel.apache.org by Raghu <bn...@gmail.com> on 2014/04/02 07:46:24 UTC

Re: DataFormat Versus TypeConverters

Hi Yagyesh,

Were you able to crack this?
Even I have same problem and still not able to get any solution for this.

If you done, can you share the code with me please?

Thanks,
Raghu



--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DataFormat-Versus-TypeConverters-tp5747307p5749650.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: DataFormat Versus TypeConverters

Posted by Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>.

Sorry for the delay, I missed the original post from February.

This seems to me like a question on customising the Jackson bindings. Have
you tried using the @JsonValue annotation?

Have a look at [1].

[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13386930/why-doesnt-jsonunwrapped-work-for-lists

HTH,

*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Raghu <bn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Yagyesh,
>
> Were you able to crack this?
> Even I have same problem and still not able to get any solution for this.
>
> If you done, can you share the code with me please?
>
> Thanks,
> Raghu
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DataFormat-Versus-TypeConverters-tp5747307p5749650.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>