servicemix-web.war over servicemix standalone

[devg <de...@impactplm.com>]

I am new to servicemix (still trying to decide over Mule). 

My question:

What is the advantage of deploying as a webapp over using servicemix
standalone ?

Also, where is the servicemix.xml file for the webapp? Doesn't it need one?

Thnx
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-t1525873.html#a4144522
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.

Re: servicemix-web.war over servicemix standalone

[kaarthikl <ka...@nsn.com>]

Hi Guillaume

Does that mean, that we cannot create new BC\SE and add it to the
servicemix-web?

cheers
Kaarthik


gnodet wrote:
> 
> It's up to you if you want to embed servicemix to use it as a tool
> (like Mule for example) and rely on a static configuration file, or to
> use it as a container (like a web container) so you can deploy
> components / service assemblies at runtime.
> This is the main difference between the two modes.
> 
> If you look at servicemix-web (in the examples of the distribution),
> you will find it.
> It is named applicationContext.xml, but otherwise is the same.
> 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> 
> On 4/28/06, devg <de...@impactplm.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am new to servicemix (still trying to decide over Mule).
>>
>> My question:
>>
>> What is the advantage of deploying as a webapp over using servicemix
>> standalone ?
>>
>> Also, where is the servicemix.xml file for the webapp? Doesn't it need
>> one?
>>
>> Thnx
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-t1525873.html#a4144522
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-tp4144522p25871204.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: servicemix-web.war over servicemix standalone

[Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>]

It's up to you if you want to embed servicemix to use it as a tool
(like Mule for example) and rely on a static configuration file, or to
use it as a container (like a web container) so you can deploy
components / service assemblies at runtime.
This is the main difference between the two modes.

If you look at servicemix-web (in the examples of the distribution),
you will find it.
It is named applicationContext.xml, but otherwise is the same.

Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

On 4/28/06, devg <de...@impactplm.com> wrote:
>
> I am new to servicemix (still trying to decide over Mule).
>
> My question:
>
> What is the advantage of deploying as a webapp over using servicemix
> standalone ?
>
> Also, where is the servicemix.xml file for the webapp? Doesn't it need one?
>
> Thnx
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-t1525873.html#a4144522
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>