You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com> on 2023/11/01 16:34:10 UTC

[DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

All,

I want to kickstart a discussion of developing a new tool - csbench, that can help with generating resource load and measuring  the performance and efficiency of Apache CloudStack APIs.

Much like cmk, this tool can be written in Go and can be useful for anybody to benchmark CloudStack API performance. It's still in a nascent stage and can benefit from feedback and input from the wider community early in the development process.

If there are no objections, I propose to create a cloudstack-csbench repo in which this tool can be developed. Thoughts and feedback? Thanks.


Regards.

 


Re: [DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Thanks all, since there have been no objections I've got a new repository created here:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-csbench


Regards.

________________________________
From: Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 15:13
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

thanks Rohit,
It is a great idea. I have some questions concerning "measuring is influencing" and "prerequisites",
but those should not stop us from creating a repo for this in the project
great idea,

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:58 AM Nux <nu...@li.nux.ro>> wrote:
Great idea, looking forward to it.


On 2023-11-01 16:34, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
> I want to kickstart a discussion of developing a new tool - csbench,
> that can help with generating resource load and measuring  the
> performance and efficiency of Apache CloudStack APIs.
>
> Much like cmk, this tool can be written in Go and can be useful for
> anybody to benchmark CloudStack API performance. It's still in a
> nascent stage and can benefit from feedback and input from the wider
> community early in the development process.
>
> If there are no objections, I propose to create a cloudstack-csbench
> repo in which this tool can be developed. Thoughts and feedback?
> Thanks.
>
>
> Regards.


--
Daan

 


Re: [DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
thanks Rohit,
It is a great idea. I have some questions concerning "measuring is
influencing" and "prerequisites",
but those should not stop us from creating a repo for this in the project
great idea,

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:58 AM Nux <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Great idea, looking forward to it.
>
>
> On 2023-11-01 16:34, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I want to kickstart a discussion of developing a new tool - csbench,
> > that can help with generating resource load and measuring  the
> > performance and efficiency of Apache CloudStack APIs.
> >
> > Much like cmk, this tool can be written in Go and can be useful for
> > anybody to benchmark CloudStack API performance. It's still in a
> > nascent stage and can benefit from feedback and input from the wider
> > community early in the development process.
> >
> > If there are no objections, I propose to create a cloudstack-csbench
> > repo in which this tool can be developed. Thoughts and feedback?
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
>


-- 
Daan

Re: [DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

Posted by Nux <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
Great idea, looking forward to it.


On 2023-11-01 16:34, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
> 
> I want to kickstart a discussion of developing a new tool - csbench, 
> that can help with generating resource load and measuring  the 
> performance and efficiency of Apache CloudStack APIs.
> 
> Much like cmk, this tool can be written in Go and can be useful for 
> anybody to benchmark CloudStack API performance. It's still in a 
> nascent stage and can benefit from feedback and input from the wider 
> community early in the development process.
> 
> If there are no objections, I propose to create a cloudstack-csbench 
> repo in which this tool can be developed. Thoughts and feedback? 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Regards.