You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Emanuel Winocur <2a...@cox.net> on 2011/11/07 19:02:13 UTC
EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Dear Friends, I am overwhelmed with the quantity of emails send to me by
many members. I not longer can deal with this!~! PLEASE DELETE ME FROM THE
LIST OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION'S.
Emanuel M. Winocur
2always@cox.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "André Schnabel" <an...@gmx.net>
To: <oo...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other
matters)
> Hi Rob,
>
> Am 07.11.2011 16:51, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andre Schnabel<An...@gmx.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> The jurisdiction of the creator only matters in the case of local
>> infringement or in the context of international treaties. And I don't
>> believe any treaties have recognized sui generis IP rights for
>> collections of facts, i.e., databases. It has been discussed but
>> there is no agreement. See the WIPO statement on this:
>>
>> http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/activities/databases.html
>
> This is not a statement on IP rights for databases - it is a statement on
> IP rights for
> *Non-Original Databases* .
>
> We obviously disagree on this part of the text:
> " The originality requirement that a database must constitute an
> intellectual creation
> by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents in order to
> enjoy copyright
> protection means that some databases are not protected ..."
>
> So obviously some databases actually are protected. Of course - if you
> think, that a
> dictionary is just a mere collection of words you would obviously come to
> the
> conclusion that this is no intellectual creation.
>
> btw ... if IBM does have dictionaries available, why don't you just
> publish those, if
> there is no copyright protection in place? Doing so would end this
> discussion very
> quickly andwould be a great contribution to the project.
>
> regards,
>
> André
Re: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
> <oo...@incubator.apache.org>
>
And I've verified that the poster is successfully removed from the list.
We now have 277 subscribers on ooo-dev, 18 more than we had 10 days ago.
-Rob
Re: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Posted by Donald Whytock <dw...@gmail.com>.
To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
<oo...@incubator.apache.org>
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Emanuel Winocur <2a...@cox.net> wrote:
> Dear Friends, I am overwhelmed with the quantity of emails send to me by
> many members. I not longer can deal with this!~! PLEASE DELETE ME FROM THE
> LIST OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION'S.
> Emanuel M. Winocur
> 2always@cox.net
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "André Schnabel" <an...@gmx.net>
> To: <oo...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other
> matters)
>
>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Am 07.11.2011 16:51, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andre Schnabel<An...@gmx.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The jurisdiction of the creator only matters in the case of local
>>> infringement or in the context of international treaties. And I don't
>>> believe any treaties have recognized sui generis IP rights for
>>> collections of facts, i.e., databases. It has been discussed but
>>> there is no agreement. See the WIPO statement on this:
>>>
>>> http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/activities/databases.html
>>
>> This is not a statement on IP rights for databases - it is a statement on
>> IP rights for
>> *Non-Original Databases* .
>>
>> We obviously disagree on this part of the text:
>> " The originality requirement that a database must constitute an
>> intellectual creation
>> by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents in order to
>> enjoy copyright
>> protection means that some databases are not protected ..."
>>
>> So obviously some databases actually are protected. Of course - if you
>> think, that a
>> dictionary is just a mere collection of words you would obviously come to
>> the
>> conclusion that this is no intellectual creation.
>>
>> btw ... if IBM does have dictionaries available, why don't you just
>> publish those, if
>> there is no copyright protection in place? Doing so would end this
>> discussion very
>> quickly andwould be a great contribution to the project.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> André
>
>
Re: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
done
neddamian@comcast.net wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:21:01 +0000:
> I have tried 3 times to get my email removed by sending a message to the autodelete mailbox. Please rmove mine also. neddamian@comcast.net.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emanuel Winocur" <2a...@cox.net>
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 1:02:13 PM
> Subject: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
>
> Dear Friends, I am overwhelmed with the quantity of emails send to me by
> many members. I not longer can deal with this!~! PLEASE DELETE ME FROM THE
> LIST OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION'S.
> Emanuel M. Winocur
> 2always@cox.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "André Schnabel" <an...@gmx.net>
> To: <oo...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other
> matters)
>
>
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Am 07.11.2011 16:51, schrieb Rob Weir:
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andre Schnabel<An...@gmx.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> The jurisdiction of the creator only matters in the case of local
> >> infringement or in the context of international treaties. And I don't
> >> believe any treaties have recognized sui generis IP rights for
> >> collections of facts, i.e., databases. It has been discussed but
> >> there is no agreement. See the WIPO statement on this:
> >>
> >> http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/activities/databases.html
> >
> > This is not a statement on IP rights for databases - it is a statement on
> > IP rights for
> > *Non-Original Databases* .
> >
> > We obviously disagree on this part of the text:
> > " The originality requirement that a database must constitute an
> > intellectual creation
> > by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents in order to
> > enjoy copyright
> > protection means that some databases are not protected ..."
> >
> > So obviously some databases actually are protected. Of course - if you
> > think, that a
> > dictionary is just a mere collection of words you would obviously come to
> > the
> > conclusion that this is no intellectual creation.
> >
> > btw ... if IBM does have dictionaries available, why don't you just
> > publish those, if
> > there is no copyright protection in place? Doing so would end this
> > discussion very
> > quickly andwould be a great contribution to the project.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > André
>
Re: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Posted by ne...@comcast.net.
I have tried 3 times to get my email removed by sending a message to the autodelete mailbox. Please rmove mine also. neddamian@comcast.net.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Emanuel Winocur" <2a...@cox.net>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 1:02:13 PM
Subject: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Dear Friends, I am overwhelmed with the quantity of emails send to me by
many members. I not longer can deal with this!~! PLEASE DELETE ME FROM THE
LIST OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION'S.
Emanuel M. Winocur
2always@cox.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "André Schnabel" <an...@gmx.net>
To: <oo...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other
matters)
> Hi Rob,
>
> Am 07.11.2011 16:51, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andre Schnabel<An...@gmx.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> The jurisdiction of the creator only matters in the case of local
>> infringement or in the context of international treaties. And I don't
>> believe any treaties have recognized sui generis IP rights for
>> collections of facts, i.e., databases. It has been discussed but
>> there is no agreement. See the WIPO statement on this:
>>
>> http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/activities/databases.html
>
> This is not a statement on IP rights for databases - it is a statement on
> IP rights for
> *Non-Original Databases* .
>
> We obviously disagree on this part of the text:
> " The originality requirement that a database must constitute an
> intellectual creation
> by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents in order to
> enjoy copyright
> protection means that some databases are not protected ..."
>
> So obviously some databases actually are protected. Of course - if you
> think, that a
> dictionary is just a mere collection of words you would obviously come to
> the
> conclusion that this is no intellectual creation.
>
> btw ... if IBM does have dictionaries available, why don't you just
> publish those, if
> there is no copyright protection in place? Doing so would end this
> discussion very
> quickly andwould be a great contribution to the project.
>
> regards,
>
> André