You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com> on 2021/12/19 16:35:06 UTC
JGroups
While getting the JavaFX modeler running again, I was having issues with
JGroups classes/interfaces not being found/defined, so I added version 5.x
to the POM and it didn't work. Then 4.x and it didn't work. Then 3.x and it
didn't work. Then 2.x and it finally worked.
Does Cayenne only work with JGroups 2.x? *
Thanks,
mrg
* I used 2.12.3.Final here...
Re: JGroups
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <aa...@gmail.com>.
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY,
> multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY,
> multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_CONFIG_URL_PROPERTY,
> javaGroupsFile, "");
> if (StringUtils.equals(eventBridgefactory,
> JavaGroupsBridgeFactory.class.getName()))
None of these settings are in the Modeler for quite some time.
> Maybe best to duplicate the constants locally and drop the dependencies? I
> just don't like repeating things...
I'd to avoid such a heavy dependency if all we need is constants, but luckily not an issue anymore.
Andrus
> On Dec 20, 2021, at 4:00 PM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, I was pulling in cayenne-jgroups primarily to access constants, such
> as:
>
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY,
> multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY,
> multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_CONFIG_URL_PROPERTY,
> javaGroupsFile, "");
> if (StringUtils.equals(eventBridgefactory,
> JavaGroupsBridgeFactory.class.getName()))
> ...
>
> If I didn't add JGroupsModule as a DI module it crashed (forget the exact
> reason right now, but I can try it again later). Note: It didn't break ages
> ago when I was using 4.0.B1, but after I updated it to use 4.0.2. When
> using B1 I had access to the constants without needing to provide a JGroups
> dependency.
>
> Maybe best to duplicate the constants locally and drop the dependencies? I
> just don't like repeating things...
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:37 AM Andrus Adamchik <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I was about to suggest removing "cayenne-jgroups" from Cayenne 5.0
>> as an old and unreliable piece of software we don't want to support :)
>>
>> As far as the Modeler goes it should not depend on JGroups at all. All the
>> events in the Modeler are in-process and can be passed around within the
>> JVM.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2021, at 6:35 PM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> While getting the JavaFX modeler running again, I was having issues with
>>> JGroups classes/interfaces not being found/defined, so I added version
>> 5.x
>>> to the POM and it didn't work. Then 4.x and it didn't work. Then 3.x and
>> it
>>> didn't work. Then 2.x and it finally worked.
>>>
>>> Does Cayenne only work with JGroups 2.x? *
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>> * I used 2.12.3.Final here...
>>
>>
Re: JGroups
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
Well, I was pulling in cayenne-jgroups primarily to access constants, such
as:
setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY,
multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT);
setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY,
multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT);
setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_CONFIG_URL_PROPERTY,
javaGroupsFile, "");
if (StringUtils.equals(eventBridgefactory,
JavaGroupsBridgeFactory.class.getName()))
...
If I didn't add JGroupsModule as a DI module it crashed (forget the exact
reason right now, but I can try it again later). Note: It didn't break ages
ago when I was using 4.0.B1, but after I updated it to use 4.0.2. When
using B1 I had access to the constants without needing to provide a JGroups
dependency.
Maybe best to duplicate the constants locally and drop the dependencies? I
just don't like repeating things...
mrg
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:37 AM Andrus Adamchik <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I was about to suggest removing "cayenne-jgroups" from Cayenne 5.0
> as an old and unreliable piece of software we don't want to support :)
>
> As far as the Modeler goes it should not depend on JGroups at all. All the
> events in the Modeler are in-process and can be passed around within the
> JVM.
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Dec 19, 2021, at 6:35 PM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > While getting the JavaFX modeler running again, I was having issues with
> > JGroups classes/interfaces not being found/defined, so I added version
> 5.x
> > to the POM and it didn't work. Then 4.x and it didn't work. Then 3.x and
> it
> > didn't work. Then 2.x and it finally worked.
> >
> > Does Cayenne only work with JGroups 2.x? *
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> > * I used 2.12.3.Final here...
>
>
Re: JGroups
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <aa...@gmail.com>.
FWIW, I was about to suggest removing "cayenne-jgroups" from Cayenne 5.0 as an old and unreliable piece of software we don't want to support :)
As far as the Modeler goes it should not depend on JGroups at all. All the events in the Modeler are in-process and can be passed around within the JVM.
Andrus
> On Dec 19, 2021, at 6:35 PM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> While getting the JavaFX modeler running again, I was having issues with
> JGroups classes/interfaces not being found/defined, so I added version 5.x
> to the POM and it didn't work. Then 4.x and it didn't work. Then 3.x and it
> didn't work. Then 2.x and it finally worked.
>
> Does Cayenne only work with JGroups 2.x? *
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
> * I used 2.12.3.Final here...