You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Robert Menschel <Ro...@Menschel.net> on 2005/01/15 04:32:57 UTC
Re[2]: empty body
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 14, 2005, 9:17:56 AM, you wrote:
SJ> __MIME_ATTACHMENT, I believe, requires a new feature not in 3.0.2 so you
SJ> won't be able to simply drop in this rule. The problem is that without
SJ> that rule, you'll match messages with an attachment but no other body text.
SJ> One option is to combine the empty message rule with a no To rule which
SJ> should give you a pretty low FP rate. This is what the SARE rules do:
SJ> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_html.cf - search for
SJ> SARE_HTML_NO_BODY. (Why are they under html?)
It's under HTML because in our testing we found that a rule which
tested for "this is an html message" with no body and no To header to
be a better Spam indicator than "this is an email" with no body and no
To header.
I don't remember the stats at that time, and it may be worth
revisiting...
Bob Menschel
SJ> Stuart Johnston
SJ> Ingo Reinhart wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Ok, the ideea is great but dont' work for me.
>>
>> # __MIME_ATTACHMENT defined in 20_html_tests.cf
>> body __NONEMPTY_BODY /\S/
>> meta EMPTY_MESSAGE !__MIME_ATTACHMENT && !__NONEMPTY_BODY
>> describe EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to be empty with no Subject: text
>> score EMPTY_MESSAGE 2
>>
>> Any hint's?
>>
>> Ingo
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Kettler" <mk...@evi-inc.com>
>> To: "Ingo Reinhart" <i....@dung.de>; <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 6:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: empty body
>>
>>
>>> At 06:27 AM 1/13/2005, Ingo Reinhart wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> How can I test for an empty Mailbody?
>>>>
>>>> Any existing rule?
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Ingo
>>>
>>>
>>> Grab the latest SVN image from the downloads page and look at
>>> EMPTY_MESSAGE.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:Robert@Menschel.net