You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@roller.apache.org by Dave <sn...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/23 14:43:52 UTC
ROL-1379: Upgrade to Apache XMLRPC 3.0
The Apache XMLRPC project made a major new release in August 2006,
it's first in over two years.
Why should we upgrade?
1) Numerous bug fixes and improvements, see full list:
http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/changes-report.html
2) We've been using a Beta release of Apache XMLRPC 1.2 and there are
some open issues that cause problem with some character encodings (I
notice them when I repost my del.icio.us links to my blog via XMLRPC).
3) Brings us in alignment with Apache XMLRPC project. By using their
latest release, we make it easier for them to support us.
I've got XMLRPC 3.0 running with Roller in my workspace and I haven't
found any problems yet.
Any objections? comments? flames?
- Dave
See also:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1379
Re: ROL-1379: Upgrade to Apache XMLRPC 3.0
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
+1
Craig
On Mar 23, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
> +1
> Elias Torres wrote:
>> +1
>> Matt Raible wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 3/23/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The Apache XMLRPC project made a major new release in August 2006,
>>>> it's first in over two years.
>>>>
>>>> Why should we upgrade?
>>>>
>>>> 1) Numerous bug fixes and improvements, see full list:
>>>> http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/changes-report.html
>>>>
>>>> 2) We've been using a Beta release of Apache XMLRPC 1.2 and
>>>> there are
>>>> some open issues that cause problem with some character
>>>> encodings (I
>>>> notice them when I repost my del.icio.us links to my blog via
>>>> XMLRPC).
>>>>
>>>> 3) Brings us in alignment with Apache XMLRPC project. By using
>>>> their
>>>> latest release, we make it easier for them to support us.
>>>>
>>>> I've got XMLRPC 3.0 running with Roller in my workspace and I
>>>> haven't
>>>> found any problems yet.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections? comments? flames?
>>>>
>>>> - Dave
>>>>
>>>> See also:
>>>> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1379
>>>>
>>>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: ROL-1379: Upgrade to Apache XMLRPC 3.0
Posted by Allen Gilliland <al...@sun.com>.
+1
Elias Torres wrote:
> +1
>
> Matt Raible wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On 3/23/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The Apache XMLRPC project made a major new release in August 2006,
>>> it's first in over two years.
>>>
>>> Why should we upgrade?
>>>
>>> 1) Numerous bug fixes and improvements, see full list:
>>> http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/changes-report.html
>>>
>>> 2) We've been using a Beta release of Apache XMLRPC 1.2 and there are
>>> some open issues that cause problem with some character encodings (I
>>> notice them when I repost my del.icio.us links to my blog via XMLRPC).
>>>
>>> 3) Brings us in alignment with Apache XMLRPC project. By using their
>>> latest release, we make it easier for them to support us.
>>>
>>> I've got XMLRPC 3.0 running with Roller in my workspace and I haven't
>>> found any problems yet.
>>>
>>> Any objections? comments? flames?
>>>
>>> - Dave
>>>
>>> See also:
>>> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1379
>>>
>>
Re: ROL-1379: Upgrade to Apache XMLRPC 3.0
Posted by Elias Torres <el...@torrez.us>.
+1
Matt Raible wrote:
> +1
>
> On 3/23/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Apache XMLRPC project made a major new release in August 2006,
>> it's first in over two years.
>>
>> Why should we upgrade?
>>
>> 1) Numerous bug fixes and improvements, see full list:
>> http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/changes-report.html
>>
>> 2) We've been using a Beta release of Apache XMLRPC 1.2 and there are
>> some open issues that cause problem with some character encodings (I
>> notice them when I repost my del.icio.us links to my blog via XMLRPC).
>>
>> 3) Brings us in alignment with Apache XMLRPC project. By using their
>> latest release, we make it easier for them to support us.
>>
>> I've got XMLRPC 3.0 running with Roller in my workspace and I haven't
>> found any problems yet.
>>
>> Any objections? comments? flames?
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>> See also:
>> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1379
>>
>
>
Re: ROL-1379: Upgrade to Apache XMLRPC 3.0
Posted by Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
+1
On 3/23/07, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Apache XMLRPC project made a major new release in August 2006,
> it's first in over two years.
>
> Why should we upgrade?
>
> 1) Numerous bug fixes and improvements, see full list:
> http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/changes-report.html
>
> 2) We've been using a Beta release of Apache XMLRPC 1.2 and there are
> some open issues that cause problem with some character encodings (I
> notice them when I repost my del.icio.us links to my blog via XMLRPC).
>
> 3) Brings us in alignment with Apache XMLRPC project. By using their
> latest release, we make it easier for them to support us.
>
> I've got XMLRPC 3.0 running with Roller in my workspace and I haven't
> found any problems yet.
>
> Any objections? comments? flames?
>
> - Dave
>
> See also:
> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1379
>
--
http://raibledesigns.com