You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2008/01/05 22:28:41 UTC

[VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

oops.  I accidentally rebuilt the tarballs after changing the build
scripts, and they had different sums!  see below for updated
release announcement...

http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ again.

--j.

To: users, dev, announce
From: [don't forget to use your @apache.org address]
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.4 available

Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.4 is now available!  This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.

Downloads are available from:
  http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi

The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future.

  md5sum of archive files:
  2081c24c8b9064f9dd220e4f41e1d299  Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.tar.bz2
  81ec227d4d63aba08563ee868af9fbeb  Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.tar.gz
  a30aefb67a2db87b0fd2dac31116026c  Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.zip

  sha1sum of archive files:
  876fc328a2b6192fa0bb8d7f6926214716178417  Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.tar.bz2
  5c0e01831256518b27139507a4ded38e582d8649  Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.tar.gz
  387e5a8cd2c0602bc6b5ff9cf582d4ce367a8fc1  Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.zip


The release files also have a .asc file accompanying them.  The file serves as
an external GPG signature for the given release file.  The signing key is
available via the wwwkeys.pgp.net key server, as well as at:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/released/GPG-SIGNING-KEY

The key information is:

pub 1024D/265FA05B 2003-06-09 SpamAssassin Signing Key <re...@spamassassin.org>
    Key fingerprint = 26C9 00A4 6DD4 0CD5 AD24  F6D7 DEE0 1987 265F A05B


3.2.4 is a major bug-fix release, with a few minor new features.  Summary of
changes:

- bug 5599: allow load distribution of SA nameserver queries across all nameservers listed in resolv.conf, using 'dns_options rotate'. thanks to Pawel Sasin <hannibal /at/ wp-sa.pl>

- bug 5673: 'ALL' header was including spurious extra spaces between header names and values.  fix

- bug 5594: several major sa-compile fixes.  major increase in overall speed; cache results between runs to further increase speed; and fix a danger of massive memory usage

- bug 5556: fix a variety of sa-compile portability issues, and support for 5.6.x perls

- bug 5514: make 'score set for a non-existent rule' a debug message, instead of a lint warning, since it's a very frequent FAQ

- bug 5493: sa-compile fails to correctly deal with escaped backslashes.  fix

- bug 5672: remove DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE (DNSBL lookups against securitysage.com) due to unreliability

- bug 5476: update Bonded Sender (now Sender Score Certified) rules, and add a rule for their strictly-confirmed-opt-in-required zone

- bug 5538: remove FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM and FORGED_AOL_TAGS entirely; they're obsolete, given the current capabilities of AOL mail user agents

- bug 5632: remove all completewhois.com DNSBL lookups, site seems to have disappeared without warning

- bug 5715: allow for more than one sa-update MIRRORED.BY file host in DNS, for redundancy

- bug 5662: DKIM changes: recognize author signature and multiple signatures for whitelisting (with Mail::DKIM 0.29); disable useless "check_dkim_signsome"; new eval rules "check_dkim_valid_author_sig" and "check_dkim_valid" (an alias for a "check_dkim_verified" misnomer); new tags _DKIMIDENTITY_ and _DKIMDOMAIN_; updated terminology; verification speedup with Mail::DKIM 0.30 (or its pre-releases)

- bug 5696: sa-compile: cut regexp base strings at Unicode high codepoints, to avoid corruption of patterns containing UTF-8

- bug 5637: bayes_file_mode is handled incorrectly when creating bayes.mutex, resulting in incorrect permissions on that file; fix by Mihaly Barasz

- bug 5612: DB_File version 4.2.x has a bug that loops infinitely if files named '__db.{filename}' are present; work around.  thanks to J. Nick Koston for the report and fix

- bug 5606: too-early init_learner() call causes root's user prefs file to be read when spamd is started; this is inappropriate. fix

- bug 4179: if allow_user_rules is 1, user rules are not unique to each user; one user's user rules can appear in later scans for other users that are run using the same spamd process. fix

- bug 5680: ALL_TRUSTED can fire if a trusted MSA or webmail system receives the message from an untrusted X-Originating-IP: header. fix

- bug 5626: in the 'spamassassin' script, install a signal handler for SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM and SIGPIPE to ensure that temporary files are removed

- bug 5557: some temporary files are left not cleaned up on Windows; fix

- bug 5661: speed up Bayes SQL queries by allowing the use of indexes when expiring

- bug 5611: support 'spamd --nouser-config -u username', which setuids to 'username' but does not read user_prefs files from anywhere

- bug 5665: spamd may fail to notice that a child has completed exiting, and keeps in the child list in state 'K', eventually filling up the child list with 'ghost' children.  fix

- bug 5735: spamc should allow retry_sleep 0

- bug 5728: spamd: require -u with --sql-config or --ldap-config

- bug 5682: remove FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D, due to false positives and redundancy with RDNS_DYNAMIC; remove FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB due to no hits

- bug 5681: look up IP addresses found in 'X-Yahoo-Post-IP' and 'X-SenderIP' headers, too, thanks to Martin Blapp

- Bug 5589: Refined async events handling and DNS lookup completions

- bug 5586: RDNS_NONE has false positives if the MTA doesn't put the hostname in the Received header, like Communigate Pro. add an exception for this

- bug 5748: fix locale problem with use of external sort in sa-compile



Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si>.
On Sunday 06 January 2008 12:02:21 Justin Mason wrote:
> thanks guys -- that's the 3 votes needed. I'll let the vote run until
> monday at least, just to give people time to post -1's (just in case).

Perhaps it would do good to post the notice and the URL
to the users list, just in case we missed some corner case.

  Mark

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net>.
Justin Mason wrote:
> sure; I'll extract the useful stuff.
> 
> based on what Sidney says, it can wait until 3.2.5; it's not serious.
> 
> --j.
> 
> On Jan 6, 2008 7:11 PM, Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net> wrote:
>> Justin Mason wrote:
>>> those look like warnings (hopefully).  could you open a bug and attach
>>> a tarball of the
>>> temporary directory? use sa-compile --keep-tmps.
>>>
>>> On Jan 6, 2008 5:16 PM, Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net> wrote:
>>>> Justin Mason wrote:
>>>>> thanks guys -- that's the 3 votes needed. I'll let the vote run until
>>>>> monday at least, just to give people time to post -1's (just in case).
>>>>>
>>>>> --j.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 6, 2008 1:14 AM, Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> wrote:
>>>>>> Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> I installed 3.2.4 and ran sa-compile and saw the following errors:
>>>>
>>>> body_0.xs: In function
>>>> 'XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_scan':
>>>> body_0.xs:131: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:140: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:149: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:158: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:167: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:176: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:185: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:194: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:203: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:212: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:221: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:230: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:239: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:248: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:257: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:266: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:275: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:284: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>>>> truth value
>>>> body_0.xs:114: warning: unused variable 'i'
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>  -Doc
>>>>
>>>>  Penguins: Do it on the ice.
>>>>    8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37
>>>>
>>>>  SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>> I opened a bug but the tarball is too big to attach, should I add it
>> somewhere for downloading?
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>  -Doc
>>
>>  Penguins: Do it on the ice.
>>    8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37
>>
>>  SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>>
>>
I attached it to a mail just to you Justin.

-- 

 -Doc

 Penguins: Do it on the ice.
   8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37

 SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
sure; I'll extract the useful stuff.

based on what Sidney says, it can wait until 3.2.5; it's not serious.

--j.

On Jan 6, 2008 7:11 PM, Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net> wrote:
>
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > those look like warnings (hopefully).  could you open a bug and attach
> > a tarball of the
> > temporary directory? use sa-compile --keep-tmps.
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2008 5:16 PM, Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net> wrote:
> >> Justin Mason wrote:
> >>> thanks guys -- that's the 3 votes needed. I'll let the vote run until
> >>> monday at least, just to give people time to post -1's (just in case).
> >>>
> >>> --j.
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 6, 2008 1:14 AM, Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> wrote:
> >>>> Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>>   Mark
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> I installed 3.2.4 and ran sa-compile and saw the following errors:
> >>
> >> body_0.xs: In function
> >> 'XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_scan':
> >> body_0.xs:131: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:140: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:149: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:158: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:167: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:176: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:185: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:194: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:203: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:212: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:221: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:230: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:239: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:248: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:257: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:266: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:275: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:284: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> >> truth value
> >> body_0.xs:114: warning: unused variable 'i'
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>  -Doc
> >>
> >>  Penguins: Do it on the ice.
> >>    8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37
> >>
> >>  SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
> >>
> >>
>
> I opened a bug but the tarball is too big to attach, should I add it
> somewhere for downloading?
>
> --
>
>
>  -Doc
>
>  Penguins: Do it on the ice.
>    8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37
>
>  SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>
>

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net>.
Justin Mason wrote:
> those look like warnings (hopefully).  could you open a bug and attach
> a tarball of the
> temporary directory? use sa-compile --keep-tmps.
> 
> On Jan 6, 2008 5:16 PM, Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net> wrote:
>> Justin Mason wrote:
>>> thanks guys -- that's the 3 votes needed. I'll let the vote run until
>>> monday at least, just to give people time to post -1's (just in case).
>>>
>>> --j.
>>>
>>> On Jan 6, 2008 1:14 AM, Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> wrote:
>>>> Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>   Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>> I installed 3.2.4 and ran sa-compile and saw the following errors:
>>
>> body_0.xs: In function
>> 'XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_scan':
>> body_0.xs:131: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:140: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:149: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:158: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:167: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:176: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:185: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:194: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:203: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:212: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:221: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:230: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:239: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:248: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:257: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:266: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:275: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:284: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
>> truth value
>> body_0.xs:114: warning: unused variable 'i'
>>
>> --
>>
>>  -Doc
>>
>>  Penguins: Do it on the ice.
>>    8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37
>>
>>  SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>>
>>

I opened a bug but the tarball is too big to attach, should I add it
somewhere for downloading?

-- 

 -Doc

 Penguins: Do it on the ice.
   8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37

 SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net>.
Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote, On 7/1/08 7:11 AM:
>> those look like warnings (hopefully).  could you open a bug and attach
>> a tarball of the
>> temporary directory? use sa-compile --keep-tmps.
> 
> I did that and can verify that in body_0.c there is code that would
> produce those warnings if those warnings were enabled in the C
> compilation. There are #line directives that would cause the warnings to
> say "body_0.xs" as Doc showed, there are a number of lines of the form
>  while (match = Mail_SpamAssassin_CompiledRegexps_body_0_scan1 (&cursor))
> which would generate a warning in case the '='is a typo for '==' and
> there is a declaration 'int i;' but no use of variable 'i'.
> 
> So it appears that the difference is which warnings are enabled in the
> compiler on our platforms using whatever command line sa-compile uses to
> compile.
> 
>  -- sidney

I forgot to add things like OS and versions.

OS: CentOS 5 x86_64
re2c 0.13.1
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
perl 5.8.8

All modules are up to the current versions, also.

But from what I think you're saying they're just warnings and can be
ignored for the most part?
-- 

 -Doc

 Penguins: Do it on the ice.
   8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37

 SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com>.
Justin Mason wrote, On 7/1/08 7:11 AM:
> those look like warnings (hopefully).  could you open a bug and attach
> a tarball of the
> temporary directory? use sa-compile --keep-tmps.

I did that and can verify that in body_0.c there is code that would produce those warnings 
if those warnings were enabled in the C compilation. There are #line directives that would 
cause the warnings to say "body_0.xs" as Doc showed, there are a number of lines of the form
  while (match = Mail_SpamAssassin_CompiledRegexps_body_0_scan1 (&cursor))
which would generate a warning in case the '='is a typo for '==' and there is a 
declaration 'int i;' but no use of variable 'i'.

So it appears that the difference is which warnings are enabled in the compiler on our 
platforms using whatever command line sa-compile uses to compile.

  -- sidney


Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
those look like warnings (hopefully).  could you open a bug and attach
a tarball of the
temporary directory? use sa-compile --keep-tmps.

On Jan 6, 2008 5:16 PM, Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net> wrote:
>
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > thanks guys -- that's the 3 votes needed. I'll let the vote run until
> > monday at least, just to give people time to post -1's (just in case).
> >
> > --j.
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2008 1:14 AM, Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> wrote:
> >> Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
> >> +1
> >>
> >>   Mark
> >>
> >>
>
> I installed 3.2.4 and ran sa-compile and saw the following errors:
>
> body_0.xs: In function
> 'XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_scan':
> body_0.xs:131: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:140: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:149: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:158: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:167: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:176: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:185: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:194: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:203: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:212: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:221: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:230: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:239: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:248: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:257: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:266: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:275: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:284: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
> truth value
> body_0.xs:114: warning: unused variable 'i'
>
> --
>
>  -Doc
>
>  Penguins: Do it on the ice.
>    8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37
>
>  SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>
>

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net>.
Justin Mason wrote:
> thanks guys -- that's the 3 votes needed. I'll let the vote run until
> monday at least, just to give people time to post -1's (just in case).
> 
> --j.
> 
> On Jan 6, 2008 1:14 AM, Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> wrote:
>> Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
>> +1
>>
>>   Mark
>>
>>

I installed 3.2.4 and ran sa-compile and saw the following errors:

body_0.xs: In function
‘XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_scan’:
body_0.xs:131: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:140: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:149: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:158: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:167: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:176: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:185: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:194: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:203: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:212: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:221: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:230: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:239: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:248: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:257: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:266: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:275: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:284: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value
body_0.xs:114: warning: unused variable ‘i’

-- 

 -Doc

 Penguins: Do it on the ice.
   8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37

 SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
thanks guys -- that's the 3 votes needed. I'll let the vote run until
monday at least, just to give people time to post -1's (just in case).

--j.

On Jan 6, 2008 1:14 AM, Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> wrote:
> Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
> +1
>
>   Mark
>
>

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si>.
Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
+1

  Mark

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si>.
Looks fine, checked on FreeBSD 6.2.
+1

  Mark

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com>.
Looks good, +1 on release

  -- sidney




Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
On Jan 5, 2008 10:03 PM, Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com> wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote, On 6/1/08 10:28 AM:
> > oops.  I accidentally rebuilt the tarballs after changing the build
> > scripts, and they had different sums!  see below for updated
> > release announcement...
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ again.
>
> What do you think about modifying the release procedure so that the announcement ends up
> as a file in http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ (or wherever) with a name like
> ANNOUNCMENT-3.2.4? That will make checking it for things like this more robust. I could
> add steps in my scripts to check that the announced version, hashes, and signatures match
> the release.

yes -- good idea!

--j.

Re: [VOTE] another recut of 3.2.4

Posted by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com>.
Justin Mason wrote, On 6/1/08 10:28 AM:
> oops.  I accidentally rebuilt the tarballs after changing the build
> scripts, and they had different sums!  see below for updated
> release announcement...
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ again.

What do you think about modifying the release procedure so that the announcement ends up 
as a file in http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/ (or wherever) with a name like 
ANNOUNCMENT-3.2.4? That will make checking it for things like this more robust. I could 
add steps in my scripts to check that the announced version, hashes, and signatures match 
the release.

  -- sidney