You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Sergey Simonchik <Se...@borland.com> on 2005/08/01 18:57:07 UTC
RTF rendering
Greeting.
Currently I work on upgrading FOP's RTF rendering. We need it as a
part of another project.
And now some patches to RTF-rendering with test cases are available.
So I have two questions:
1) Would you be so kind to tell your intention about RTF support?
2) What do you think about commiting these patches?
Thanks for attention.
Good success!
---
Sergey Simonchik.
Re: RTF rendering
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
On 01.08.2005 20:05:20 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2005, at 18:57, Sergey Simonchik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Currently I work on upgrading FOP's RTF rendering. We need it as a
> > part of another project.
> > And now some patches to RTF-rendering with test cases are available.
> > So I have two questions:
> > 1) Would you be so kind to tell your intention about RTF support?
>
> Well, there has been some talk --I think it was very early this year--
> about doing a release off the trunk that only supported RTF rendering
> (since the other renderers weren't ready yet), so I guess you could say
> that we're quite sure RTF support will be available in the next
> release.
Definitely, but at what level depends entirely on contributions for this
part. I'd love to work on it but simply have to concentrate on other
parts right now.
> Question for other devs: the Ant build indicates that the RTF renderer
> is 'still very very alpha'. Can that warning be removed or is it still
> too early?
I'll remove it. It makes no sense. The RTF output is quite usable for
not too complicated use cases.
<snip/>
Jeremias Maerki
Re: RTF rendering
Posted by Andreas L Delmelle <a_...@pandora.be>.
On Aug 1, 2005, at 18:57, Sergey Simonchik wrote:
Hi,
> Currently I work on upgrading FOP's RTF rendering. We need it as a
> part of another project.
> And now some patches to RTF-rendering with test cases are available.
> So I have two questions:
> 1) Would you be so kind to tell your intention about RTF support?
Well, there has been some talk --I think it was very early this year--
about doing a release off the trunk that only supported RTF rendering
(since the other renderers weren't ready yet), so I guess you could say
that we're quite sure RTF support will be available in the next
release.
Question for other devs: the Ant build indicates that the RTF renderer
is 'still very very alpha'. Can that warning be removed or is it still
too early?
> 2) What do you think about commiting these patches?
Well, all help is welcome, but it's difficult to say what we think if
you don't show us the patches. :-) If you don't have any objection,
just enter a Bugzilla report[1] describing the enhancements your
patches offer, attach the diff(s) and testcases, and we'll certainly
get back to you.
TIA!
Cheers,
Andreas
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fop