You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@logging.apache.org by "Shapira, Yoav" <Yo...@mpi.com> on 2003/12/24 16:04:52 UTC

[Site] Ideas? Requests?

Hi,
I've been working on the logging site (logging.apache.org).  If anyone
has ideas or requests, please let me know as I'm in a site editing mood
;)  Thanks,

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics





This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.

Re: [Site] Ideas? Requests?

Posted by Ceki Gülcü <ce...@qos.ch>.
There were two typos in my previous message. Here is the corrected
version:

We have not reached a decision about whether only one or both of
log4cplus and log4cxx should join. The question is still open. I
suspect it will mostly depend on the reaction of the of the
log4cplus and log4cxx communities.

At 06:20 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi Berin,
>
>We have not a decision about whether only one or both of log4cplus and 
>log4cxx should join. The question is still open. I suspect it will be 
>mostly depend on the reaction of the of the log4cplus and log4cxx communities.
>
>Regards,
>
>At 10:56 AM 12/25/2003 +1100, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>>I notice that the list marks both log4cplus and log4cxx as being in 
>>incubation.  Are both versions getting incorporated into 
>>logging.apache.org, and are they formally in incubation yet?
>>
>>I haven't seen them come in to incubation?  Mind you - if the logging PMC 
>>has voted to accept them, then it's just a formality to get them in.
>>
>>Merry Christmas :>.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>         Berin
>
>--
>Ceki Gülcü
>
>      For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
>      ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
>

-- 
Ceki Gülcü

      For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
      ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp

Re: [Site] Ideas? Requests?

Posted by Ceki Gülcü <ce...@qos.ch>.
Hi Berin,

We have not a decision about whether only one or both of log4cplus and 
log4cxx should join. The question is still open. I suspect it will be 
mostly depend on the reaction of the of the log4cplus and log4cxx communities.

Regards,

At 10:56 AM 12/25/2003 +1100, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>I notice that the list marks both log4cplus and log4cxx as being in 
>incubation.  Are both versions getting incorporated into 
>logging.apache.org, and are they formally in incubation yet?
>
>I haven't seen them come in to incubation?  Mind you - if the logging PMC 
>has voted to accept them, then it's just a formality to get them in.
>
>Merry Christmas :>.
>
>Cheers,
>         Berin

-- 
Ceki Gülcü

      For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
      ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp

Re: [Site] Ideas? Requests?

Posted by Berin Lautenbach <be...@wingsofhermes.org>.
Yoav,

Great stuff!

A question to the wider list...

I notice that the list marks both log4cplus and log4cxx as being in 
incubation.  Are both versions getting incorporated into 
logging.apache.org, and are they formally in incubation yet?

I haven't seen them come in to incubation?  Mind you - if the logging 
PMC has voted to accept them, then it's just a formality to get them in.

Merry Christmas :>.

Cheers,
	Berin


Shapira, Yoav wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been working on the logging site (logging.apache.org).  If anyone
> has ideas or requests, please let me know as I'm in a site editing mood
> ;)  Thanks,
> 
> Yoav Shapira
> Millennium ChemInformatics
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
> 
> 
>