You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/04/13 08:04:05 UTC
[GitHub] [spark] sigmod commented on a change in pull request #32135: [SPARK-35043][SQL] Add condition lambda and rule id to the resolve function family
sigmod commented on a change in pull request #32135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32135#discussion_r612220546
##########
File path: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
##########
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.streaming.StreamingRelationV2
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNodeRef
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreePattern.{
Review comment:
It seemed ok -- I didn't see scalastyle complained anything.
But let me know if there's a convention in the Spark codebase.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org