You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by Daniel Sahlberg <ds...@apache.org> on 2024/11/17 16:10:29 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1921524 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Hi,
This change doesn't apply cleanly to 1.14.x. It seems r1880967 (and the followup r1884640) added some typemaps which this change builds upon. I don't understand the swig bindings enough to see if we could merge the above two revisions or if that would be an incompatible change to the 1.14.x series (in which case we need a separate backport branch for r1921505).
Kind regards,
Daniel
On 2024/10/24 03:13:18 jun66j5@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jun66j5
> Date: Thu Oct 24 03:13:17 2024
> New Revision: 1921524
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921524&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Nominate r1921505
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1921524&r1=1921523&r2=1921524&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Oct 24 03:13:17 2024
> @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ Candidate changes:
> votes:
> +1: jun66j5
>
> + * r1921505
> + Make swig-py compatible with SWIG 4.3.0.
> + Justification:
> + Ditto.
> + votes:
> + +1: jun66j5
> +
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
>
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1921524 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
Posted by Jun Omae <ju...@gmail.com>.
Sorry. That's my fault.
I created a backport branch `1.14.x-r1921505` when nominating the
revision, but forgot to add a `Branch` declaration for the nomination.
Fixed in r1921922.
On 2024/11/18 1:10, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This change doesn't apply cleanly to 1.14.x. It seems r1880967 (and the followup r1884640) added some typemaps which this change builds upon. I don't understand the swig bindings enough to see if we could merge the above two revisions or if that would be an incompatible change to the 1.14.x series (in which case we need a separate backport branch for r1921505).
>
> Kind regards,
> Daniel
>
> On 2024/10/24 03:13:18 jun66j5@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jun66j5
>> Date: Thu Oct 24 03:13:17 2024
>> New Revision: 1921524
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921524&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * STATUS: Nominate r1921505
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1921524&r1=1921523&r2=1921524&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Oct 24 03:13:17 2024
>> @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ Candidate changes:
>> votes:
>> +1: jun66j5
>>
>> + * r1921505
>> + Make swig-py compatible with SWIG 4.3.0.
>> + Justification:
>> + Ditto.
>> + votes:
>> + +1: jun66j5
>> +
>> Veto-blocked changes:
>> =====================
--
Jun Omae <ju...@gmail.com> (大前 潤)