You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@mxnet.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/03/17 02:43:37 UTC

[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] szha edited a comment on issue #17783: [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development

szha edited a comment on issue #17783: [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17783#issuecomment-599800518
 
 
   +1 for option 1 and 2
   
   My concerns on 3 and 4 are that DJL is a separate project which has its own release cycle. Having it to support MXNet's inference will cause delays as DJL upgrades to the latest version. This will also complicate the testing and validation.
   
   Overall, I think a minimum set of API for at least inference is needed for MXNet JVM ecosystem users.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services