You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to general@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> on 2012/05/31 06:57:44 UTC

Re: new xgc release required for fop 1.1 release?

sounds reasonable

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:55 PM, The Web Maestro
<th...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Pascal Sancho <pa...@takoma.fr>
> wrote:
> > Hi Glenn,
> >
> > 1.1rc1 sounds good for me.
> > If further RC is required, the only final digit needs to be incremented.
> > In addition, this version name indicates by itself that this version
> should
> > not be used in prod.
>
> So I think that would be:
>
> - fop-1.1rc (svn-tag: fop-1_1rc)
> - commons-1.5rc (svn-tag: commons-1_5rc)
>
> Should this be on general@?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Clay Leeds
> --
> <th...@gmail.com> - <http://ourlil.com/>
> My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
> - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
>