You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/04/02 19:57:21 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow-site] nealrichardson commented on a change in pull request #97: ARROW-11911: [Website] Add protobuf vs arrow to FAQ

nealrichardson commented on a change in pull request #97:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/97#discussion_r606395196



##########
File path: faq.md
##########
@@ -174,6 +174,31 @@ and are commonly used together in applications.  Storing your data on disk
 using Parquet and reading it into memory in the Arrow format will allow
 you to make the most of your computing hardware.
 
+#### **What is the difference between Apache Arrow and Google Protobuf?**

Review comment:
       I think you should move this to after the discussion of Feather. It interrupts the flow of the discussion from Parquet (a columnar data file format we recommend) to Feather (if there is an Arrow file format, why do you recommend Parquet?), and IIUC "what about protobuf" is more similar of a question to "what about flatbuffers".




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org