You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "Jon Harper (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/08/23 14:57:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (AMQ-7039) consummer.receive(timeout) doesn't wait
for timeout when the broker has a 0 QueuePrefetch PolicyEntry and is killed
Jon Harper created AMQ-7039:
-------------------------------
Summary: consummer.receive(timeout) doesn't wait for timeout when the broker has a 0 QueuePrefetch PolicyEntry and is killed
Key: AMQ-7039
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7039
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Jon Harper
Attachments: QueuePrefetchBusyLoopTestCase.zip
Start a broker with
{{noformat}}
<policyEntry queue=">" queuePrefetch="0"/>
{{noformat}}
Run a client with the failover transport that has code like:
{{noformat}}
while (true) {
consummer.receive(1000);
}
{{noformat}}
When you kill the server, the client goes into a busy loop and uses 100% cpu.
This does not happen when the policyentry has the default queuePrefetch.
This seems to be because the ActiveMQMessageConsummer receives the command to update its prefetchSize value but only updates CurrentPrefetchSize and not prefetchSize.
In sendPullCommand, getCurrentPrefetchSize is checked to send or not a pullcomand, but then just after in receive(timout) prefetchSize is checked to call dequeue(-1) or dequeue(timeout)
Attached is a maven testcase that reproduces the problem:
{{noformat}}
$ mvn clean test
testQueuePrefetch1000 OK
testQueuePrefetch0 KO
Results :
Failed tests: testQueuePrefetch0(QueuePrefetchBusyLoopTestCase): receive should block even when the broker is shutdown
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
{{noformat}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)