You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by on 2007/05/15 10:09:59 UTC
USER_IN_WHITELIST
Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// Phone: +44 (0) 845 869 2749 SIP: uxbod@sip.splatnix.net
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST
Posted by .
Resolved :) Thanks.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:47 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com> wrote:
> ok - not the same problem I have
>
> is -100 too high for you ?
>
> --[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>
>>I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I
> noticed a email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender
> domain, so looked at how it had been scored and noticed that the rule
> USER_IN_WHITELIST had been hit with a -100.
>>
>>On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:35:35 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and
>>>>
>>>>
>>>the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin.
>>>There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about scores it s in 50_scores.cf
>>>
>>>BUT it's better to overwrite these parameters upadating the local.cf
>>>instead.
>>>
>>>What is the problem ?
>>>I may have the same !!
>>>
>>>Cedric
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>>>MailScanner, and is
>>>believed to be clean.
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> Cedric BUSCHINI
> - CARAX -
> IT Department
>
> Phone : + 33 1 4006 9864
> fax : + 33 1 4006 9865
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// Phone: +44 (0) 845 869 2749 SIP: uxbod@sip.splatnix.net
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST
Posted by .
It wouldn't be if we had any user whitelists set up ! Thats the problem. This is a vanilla installation and we have no individual user preferences setup. All is controlled by a single account, as the mail is then passed onto a Notes server. I have looked at that rule and can see that it uses the function eval:check_from_in_whitelist(), but need to see how that works.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:47 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com> wrote:
> ok - not the same problem I have
> is -100 too high for you ?
>
> --[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>
>>I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I
> noticed a email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender
> domain, so looked at how it had been scored and noticed that the rule
> USER_IN_WHITELIST had been hit with a -100.
>>
>>On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:35:35 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and
>>>>
>>>>
>>>the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin.
>>>There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about scores it s in 50_scores.cf
>>>
>>>BUT it's better to overwrite these parameters upadating the local.cf
>>>instead.
>>>
>>>What is the problem ?
>>>I may have the same !!
>>>
>>>Cedric
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>>>MailScanner, and is
>>>believed to be clean.
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> Cedric BUSCHINI
> - CARAX -
> IT Department
>
> Phone : + 33 1 4006 9864
> fax : + 33 1 4006 9865
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// Phone: +44 (0) 845 869 2749 SIP: uxbod@sip.splatnix.net
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST
Posted by Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com>.
ok - not the same problem I have
is -100 too high for you ?
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I noticed a email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender domain, so looked at how it had been scored and noticed that the rule USER_IN_WHITELIST had been hit with a -100.
>
>On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:35:35 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com> wrote:
>
>
>>--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>>Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and
>>>
>>>
>>the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin.
>>There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about scores it s in 50_scores.cf
>>
>>BUT it's better to overwrite these parameters upadating the local.cf
>>instead.
>>
>>What is the problem ?
>>I may have the same !!
>>
>>Cedric
>>
>>--
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>>MailScanner, and is
>>believed to be clean.
>>
>>
--
Cedric BUSCHINI
- CARAX -
IT Department
Phone : + 33 1 4006 9864
fax : + 33 1 4006 9865
Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST
Posted by .
I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I noticed a email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender domain, so looked at how it had been scored and noticed that the rule USER_IN_WHITELIST had been hit with a -100.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:35:35 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com> wrote:
> --[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>
>>Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and
> the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin.
> There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about scores it s in 50_scores.cf
>
> BUT it's better to overwrite these parameters upadating the local.cf
> instead.
>
> What is the problem ?
> I may have the same !!
>
> Cedric
>
> --
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// Phone: +44 (0) 845 869 2749 SIP: uxbod@sip.splatnix.net
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST
Posted by Cedric BUSCHINI <cb...@carax.com>.
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
>Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
>
>
Hi,
Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin.
There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about scores it s in 50_scores.cf
BUT it's better to overwrite these parameters upadating the local.cf
instead.
What is the problem ?
I may have the same !!
Cedric
--