[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2248) Replace "master" and "slave" terminology

["ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14057318#comment-14057318 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on COUCHDB-2248:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 679af60c7abbac03fd223738407e485611cb2275 in couchdb-documentation's branch refs/heads/import-master from [~kxepal]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb-documentation.git;h=679af60 ]

Use "single-master" technical term which inspired by RFC 3384

COUCHDB-2248


> Replace "master" and "slave" terminology
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-2248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2248
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Noah Slater
>            Assignee: Alexander Shorin
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Inspired by the comments on this PR:
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/2692
> Summary is: `master` and `slave` are racially charged terms, and it would be good to avoid them. Django have gone for `primary` and `replica`. But we also have to deal with what we now call multi-master setups. I propose "peer to peer" as a replacement, or just "peer" if you're describing one node.
> As far as I can tell, the primary work here is the docs. The wiki and any supporting material can be updated after.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)